Mind 120 (479):833-43 (2011)

Pablo Cobreros
Universidad de Navarra
Though it is standardly assumed that supervaluationism applied to vagueness is committed to global validity, Achille Varzi (2007) argues that the supervaluationist should take seriously the idea of adopting local validity instead. Varzi’s motivation for the adoption of local validity is largely based on two objections against the global notion: that it brings some counterexamples to classically valid rules of inference and that it is inconsistent with unrestricted higher-order vagueness. In this discussion I review these objections and point out ways to address them not considered in Varzi’s paper.
Keywords Global Validity  Supervaluationism  Vagueness  Higher-order vagueness  Logical consequence
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/mind/fzq069
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,214
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Supervaluationism and Its Logics.Achille C. Varzi - 2007 - Mind 116 (463):633-676.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Tolerant, Classical, Strict.Pablo Cobreros, Paul Egré, David Ripley & Robert van Rooij - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (2):347-385.
Vagueness: Subvaluationism.Pablo Cobreros - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (5):472-485.
Meta-Inferences and Supervaluationism.Luca Incurvati & Julian J. Schlöder - forthcoming - Journal of Philosophical Logic:1-34.
Supervaluationism and Good Reasoning.Timothy Williamson - 2018 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 33 (3):521-537.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
226 ( #49,844 of 2,507,638 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,140 of 2,507,638 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes