The processing of inflected forms

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):1018-1019 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Clahsen proposes two distinct processing routes, for regularly and irregularly inflected forms, respectively, and thus is apparently making a psychological claim. We argue that his position, which embodies a strictly linguistic perspective, does not constitute a psychological processing model.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,143

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Linguistics fit for dialogue.Simon Garrod & Martin J. Pickering - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):678-678.
The Dual-Mechanism Debate.Martina Penke - 2012 - In Markus Werning, Wolfram Hinzen & Edouard Machery, The Oxford Handbook of Compositionality. Oxford University Press.
Is language processing different in dialogue?Dale J. Barr & Boaz Keysar - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):190-191.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
46 (#526,188)

6 months
5 (#828,522)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references