- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The processing of inflected forms
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):1018-1019 (1999)
Abstract
Clahsen proposes two distinct processing routes, for regularly and irregularly inflected forms, respectively, and thus is apparently making a psychological claim. We argue that his position, which embodies a strictly linguistic perspective, does not constitute a psychological processing model.My notes
Similar books and articles
Complexity effects are found in all relative-clause sentence forms.Glenda Andrews & Graeme S. Halford - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):95-95.
Linguistics fit for dialogue.Simon Garrod & Martin J. Pickering - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):678-678.
What is more explanatory, processing capacity or processing speed?Nelson Cowan - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):835-836.
Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience?Rolf Reber, Norbert Schwarz & Piotr Winkielman - 2004 - Personality and Social Psychology Review 8 (4):364-382.
What is mental representation? And how does it relate to consciousness?Timothy L. Hubbard - 2007 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (1):37-61.
Is human information processing conscious?Max Velmans - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (4):651-69.
What Does the Mind Do that the Brain Does Not?Jean E. Burns - 2010 - In R. L. Amoroso (ed.), The Complementarity of Mind and Body: Fulfilling the Dream of Descartes, Einstein and Eccles. Nova Science.
Semantic processing for finite domains.Martha Stone Palmer - 1990 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Automatic semantic interpretation: a computer model of understanding natural language.Jan van Bakel - 1984 - Cinnaminson, U.S.A.: Foris Publications.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
20 (#720,454)
6 months
2 (#1,136,865)
2009-01-28
Downloads
20 (#720,454)
6 months
2 (#1,136,865)
Historical graph of downloads
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6d9b7f7c4c-67rzb uwo