Irreplaceable Design: On the Non-Instrumental Value of Biological Variation

Ethics and the Environment 25 (2):45 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The protection of species ranks highly among environmentalist priorities, and many environmentalists expect the public to respect and support efforts to protect and rehabilitate endangered species. There are a range of instrumental and anthropocentric justifications for these attitudes, yet some environmentalists want more. It is unclear that more is to be had. In particular, it is challenging to justify some environmentalist attitudes without appealing to some version of the claim that species are intrinsically valuable. However, this has been a notoriously difficult thesis to defend, and it is clearly not available to those who doubt the existence of species. In this paper, I show how a number of environmentalist commitments that appear to be about the value of species can be interpreted and defended in a way that is compatible with antirealism about species. According to my proposal, the proper target of environmentalists’ evaluative concern is the irreplaceable design that is embodied by the individuals that make up a (putative) species. This approach can capture and justify many environmentalist attitudes about the value of biological variety without attributing intrinsic value to species, or even requiring a place for species in our ontology. This enables environmentalists to effectively sidestep a number of puzzling issues surrounding the nature and value of species.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Concept of the Irreplaceable.John N. Martin - 1979 - Environmental Ethics 1 (1):31-48.
The Concept of the Irreplaceable.John N. Martin - 1979 - Environmental Ethics 1 (1):31-48.
Design Discourse: A Way Forward for Theistic Evolutionism?Erkki Vesa Rope Kojonen - 2018 - Neue Zeitschrift für Systematicsche Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 60 (3):435-451.
The Dual Role of Evo-Devo Mechanisms and the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis.Guillermo Folguera & Nicolás Lavagnino - 2018 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 22 (2):251-275.
The Value of Artefactual Organisms.Ronald Sandler - 2012 - Environmental Values 21 (1):43 - 61.
When is Architecture Not Design?Saul Fisher - 2019 - Laocoonte: Revista de Estética y Teoría de Las Artes 1 (6):183-198.
Absolute Biological Needs.Stephen McLeod - 2014 - Bioethics 28 (6):293-301.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-14

Downloads
46 (#305,111)

6 months
10 (#135,809)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Brendan Cline
California State University, Channel Islands

Citations of this work

Authenticity and Autonomy in De-Extinction.Christopher Hunter Lean - 2022 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 25 (2):116-120.
The ethics of species extinctions.Anna Wienhues, Patrik Baard, Alfonso Donoso & Markku Oksanen - 2023 - Cambridge Prisms: Extinction 1 (e23):1–15.
Synthetic Biology and the Goals of Conservation.Christopher Hunter Lean - forthcoming - Ethics, Policy and Environment.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references