An Anti-Commodification Defense of Veganism

Ethics, Policy and Environment 19 (3):285-300 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We develop an anti-commodification defense of ethical veganism which holds that common defenses of ethical veganism can benefit from treating the commodification of non-human animals as a serious, distinct moral wrong. Drawing inspiration from Elizabeth Anderson’s account of commodification, we develop an account of commodification that identifies most uses of animals in developed countries as forms of problematic commodification. We then show that this position can make significant contributions to both welfarist defenses of ethical veganism and animal rights theories.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,623

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-09-03

Downloads
61 (#261,167)

6 months
17 (#204,834)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Patrick Clipsham
Winona State University
Katy Fulfer
University of Waterloo

Citations of this work

Vegan with Traces of Animal-Derived Ingredients? Improving the Vegan Society’s Labelling.Ricardo Miguel - 2021 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 34 (1):1-14.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Animal Liberation.Peter Singer (ed.) - 1977 - Avon Books.
Famine, Affluence, and Morality.Peter Singer - 1972 - Oxford University Press USA.
Famine, affluence, and morality.Peter Singer - 1972 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (3):229-243.
The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 2004 - Univ of California Press.

View all 30 references / Add more references