Oxford University Press (2016)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
An international team of ethicists refresh the debate about human enhancement by examining whether resistance to the use of technology to enhance our mental and physical capabilities can be supported by articulated philosophical reasoning, or explained away, e.g. in terms of psychological influences on moral reasoning.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Buy this book | $76.00 new Amazon page |
ISBN(s) | 9780198754855 019875485X |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options

A Natural Alliance Against a Common Foe? Opponents of Enhancement and the Social Model of Disability.Linda Barclay
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Charting Moral Psychology’s Significance for Bioethics: Routes to Bioethical Progress, its Limits, and Lessons From Moral Philosophy.Michael Klenk - 2020 - Diametros 17 (64):36-55.
The Reversal Test, Status Quo Bias, and Opposition to Human Cognitive Enhancement.Steve Clarke - 2016 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46 (3):369-386.
Migration and Cooperative Infrastructures.Lorenzo Del Savio, Giulia Cavaliere & Matteo Mameli - 2019 - Philosophy and Technology 32 (3):425-444.
Pharmacological Cognitive Enhancement and Cheapened Achievement: A New Dilemma.Emma C. Gordon & Lucy Dunn - 2021 - Neuroethics 14 (3):409-421.
Against Aggression? Revisiting an Overlooked Contender for Moral Bioenhancement.Cohen Marcus Lionel Brown - 2022 - Neuroethics 15 (2):1-15.
View all 6 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Steve Clarke, Julian Savulescu, C. A. J. Coady, Alberto Giubilini, and Sagar Sanyal (Eds.), The Ethics of Human Enhancement: Understanding the Debate, Oxford University Press, 2016, 269pp. [REVIEW]Stephen M. Campbell & Sven Nyholm - 2017 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2017.
Steve Clarke, Julian Savulescu, Tony Coady, Alberto Giubilini, and Sagar Sanyal: The Ethics of Human Enhancement: Understanding the Debate: Oxford University Press, 2016. Hardcover €64,32. 320 Pp.Lily Frank - 2017 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 20 (5):1095-1098.
The Ethics of Human Enhancement: Understanding the Debate.Steve Clarke, Julian Savulescu, Tony Coady, Alberto Giubilini & Sagar Sanyal (eds.) - 2016 - Oxford University Press UK.
The Ethics of Human Enhancement.Alberto Giubilini & Sagar Sanyal - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (4):233-243.
Buchanan and the Conservative Argument Against Human Enhancement From Biological and Social Harmony.Steve Clarke - 2016 - In Steve Clarke, Julian Savulescu, Tony Coady, Alberto Giubilini & Sagar Sanyal (eds.), The Ethics of Human Enhancement: Understanding the Debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 211-224.
Book Review: Julian Savulescu, Ingmar Persson, Unfit for the Future. The Need for Moral Enhancement, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2012; Steve Clarke, Julian Savulescu Et Al. , The Ethics of Human Enhancement. Understanding the Debate, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2016. [REVIEW]Luca Lo Sapio - 2017 - Scienza E Filosofia 17.
Human Freedom and Enhancement.Jan-Christoph Heilinger & Katja Crone - 2014 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 17 (1):13-21.
Normal Human Variation: Refocussing the Enhancement Debate.Guy Kahane & Julian Savulescu - 2015 - Bioethics 29 (2):133-143.
Ideas of Perfection and the Ethics of Human Enhancement.Johann A. R. Roduit, Jan-Christoph Heilinger & Holger Baumann - 2015 - Bioethics 29 (9):622-630.
Human Enhancement and Communication: On Meaning and Shared Understanding.Laura Cabrera & John Weckert - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3):1039-1056.
Human Enhancement Ethics: The State of the Debate.Nick Bostrom & Julian Savulescu - 2009 - In . Oxford University Press. pp. 1--22.
Untangling the Debate: The Ethics of Human Enhancement. [REVIEW]Patrick Lin & Fritz Allhoff - 2008 - NanoEthics 2 (3):251-264.
Paper: What is Morally Salient About Enhancement Technologies?Auke J. K. Pols & Wybo Houkes - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (2):84-87.
When is Diminishment a Form of Enhancement? : Rethinking the Enhancement Debate in Biomedical Ethics.Brian D. Earp, Anders Sandberg, Guy Kahane & Julian Savulescu - unknown
Moral Perfection and the Demand for Human Enhancement.Adriana Warmbier - forthcoming - Ethics in Progress 2015 (No.1).
Analytics
Added to PP index
2016-11-18
Total views
6 ( #1,133,527 of 2,507,351 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,393 of 2,507,351 )
2016-11-18
Total views
6 ( #1,133,527 of 2,507,351 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,393 of 2,507,351 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads