Response to June Boyce-Tillman, "Towards an Ecology of Music Education"

Philosophy of Music Education Review 12 (2):181-186 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:Philosophy of Music Education Review 12.2 (2004) 181-186 [Access article in PDF] Response to June Boyce-Tillman, "Towards an Ecology of Music Education" Claudia Gluschankof Levinsky College of Education, Israel I begin with two confessions. First, music was not my favorite class at school. I cannot even recall what we did there. It did not at all connect with the powerful, meaningful place that music had in my private life, where I loved to sing with my family, and play and sing in ensembles in classes at a private music school. The private piano lessons were fine, but I found no joy in practicing on my own. Music was for me-and still is-a communal experience, associated with personal choice. School did not, and probably could not, provide that.Second, during a recent marketing meeting at the college where I teach and work, I finally said aloud, "I am not sure that I can market a product in which I don't believe." Being a teacher in overcrowded, resource-poor schools where parents are less involved yet more interfering and being expected to conform to standards and to act more as a producer of school ceremonies and festivals and less as a music educator is not a profession I would recommend entering. Boyce-Tillman's paper offers a model for music education in which the corrective emotional experience, in my own case, becomes a remedial object lesson in the setting of the music classroom and a reason to recommend music school teaching as a rewarding profession.Boyce-Tillman calls us to conceive of music "as intimately related to human society and the environment rather than as a discrete and separated category of knowing." Her position is in tune with Christopher Small's coined term "musicking": The act of musicking establishes in the place where it is happening a set of relationships, and it is in those relationships that the meaning of the act lies. They are to be found not only between those organized sounds which are [End Page 181] conventionally thought of as being the stuff of musical meaning but also between the people who are taking part, in whatever capacity, in the performance; and they model, or stand as metaphor for, ideal relationships as the participants in the performance imagine them to be: relationships between person and person, between individual and society, between humanity and the natural world and perhaps the supernatural world.1The five interlocking areas proposed in Boyce-Tillman's model are present in Small's musicking: the relationships among the sounds parallel the area called Materials; the relationships between people and sounds may parallel the area called Expression, which refers to the personal meaning given to the organized sounds. "In the area of Construction, effectiveness often depends on the right management of repetition and contrast within a particular idiom." Such a particular idiom is part of the style ideal of a particular culture. It is defined in terms of form and content, and expresses some inner quality of the society that produced it. The style ideal can be characterized by different factors (for example, historical period, geographic location, school, manner of performance, individual composer, and so on) and can be examined in terms of musical components (form, texture, harmony, melody).2According to Boyce-Tillman, the area of Values "is related to the context of the music-making experience. All musical experiences are culturally related." Because values are shared by groups, I found this present in the relationships be-tween a subculture and the larger society, in its broader meaning. The fifth area is Spirituality, defined by Boyce-Tillman as "the ability to transport the audience to a different time/space dimension." That different time/space dimension may be understood as the supernatural world, referred to by Small.Small sees the greatest challenge to music educators today to be that of providing "that kind of social context for informal as well as formal musical interaction that leads to real development and to the musicalizing of the society as a whole,"3...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Response to June Boyce-Tillman, "Towards an Ecology of Music Education".Mark Garberich - 2004 - Philosophy of Music Education Review 12 (2):188-193.
Response to June Boyce-Tillman, "Towards an Ecology of Music Education".Elizabeth Anne Bauer - 2004 - Philosophy of Music Education Review 12 (2):186-188.
Towards an Ecology of Music Education.June Boyce-Tillman - 2004 - Philosophy of Music Education Review 12 (2):102-125.
The Transformative Qualities of a Liminal Space Created by Musicking.June Boyce-Tillman - 2009 - Philosophy of Music Education Review 17 (2):184-202.
Towards an Ecology of Music Education.June Tillman - 2004 - Philosophy of Music Education Review 12 (2):102-125.
Exploring Social Justice: How Music Education Might Matter.June Countryman & Elizabeth Gould (eds.) - 2009 - Canadian Music Educators' Association = Association Canadienne des Musiciens Éducateurs.
Toward Mindful Music Education: A Response to Bennett Reimer.Sandra Lee Stauffer - 2005 - Philosophy of Music Education Review 13 (2):135-138.
A Response to Marja Heimonen, "Justifying the Right to Music Education".Hermann J. Kaiser - 2006 - Philosophy of Music Education Review 14 (2):213-216.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
43 (#360,193)

6 months
2 (#1,263,261)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references