Poor reporting quality of key Randomization and Allocation Concealment details is still prevalent among published RCTs in 2011: a review

, , , , &
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (4):703-707 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/jep.12031

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Allocation concealment: a methodological review.Laura Clark, Ulrike Schmidt, Puvan Tharmanathan, Joy Adamson, Catherine Hewitt & David Torgerson - 2013 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (4):708-712.
Herding QATs: Quality Assessment Tools for Evidence in Medicine.Jacob Stegenga - 2015 - In Huneman, Silberstein & Lambert (eds.), Herding QATs: Quality Assessment Tools for Evidence in Medicine. pp. 193-211.
Semmelweis's methodology from the modern stand-point: intervention studies and causal ontology.Johannes Persson - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 40 (3):204-209.
A comparison of the scientific quality of publicly and privately funded randomized controlled drug trials.Richard Jones, Stuart Younie, Andrew Macallister & Jim Thornton - 2010 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (6):1322-1325.
Mothers’ perceptions of their child’s enrollment in a randomized clinical trial: Poor understanding, vulnerability and contradictory feelings.Adriana Assis Carvalho & Luciane Rezende Costa - 2013 - BMC Medical Ethics 14 (1):52.
Cluster randomized controlled trials.Suezann Puffer, David J. Torgerson & Judith Watson - 2005 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 11 (5):479-483.
Reporting of informed consent, standard of care and post-trial obligations in global randomized intervention trials: A systematic survey of registered trials.Emma R. M. Cohen, Jennifer M. O'neill, Michel Joffres, Ross E. G. Upshur & Edward Mills - 2008 - Developing World Bioethics 9 (2):74-80.
Is meta-analysis the platinum standard of evidence?Jacob Stegenga - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (4):497-507.
Reporting of patient consent in healthcare cluster randomised trials is associated with the type of study interventions and publication characteristics.Andrew McRae, Monica Taljaard, Charles Weijer, Carol Bennett, Zoe Skea, Robert Boruch, Jamie Brehaut, Martin Eccles, Jeremy Grimshaw & Allan Donner - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (2):119-124.
Systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials: the need for complete data.Michael J. Clarke & Lesley A. Stewart - 1995 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 1 (2):119-126.
Why There’s No Cause to Randomize.John Worrall - 2007 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (3):451-488.
Appraising the quality of randomized controlled trials: inter‐rater reliability for the OTseeker evidence database.Leigh Tooth, Annie McCluskey, Tammy Hoffmann, Kryss McKenna & Meryl Lovarini - 2005 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 11 (6):547-555.
Methodological quality and reporting of ethical requirements in phase III cancer trials.J. J. Tuech - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (5):251-255.
Methodological quality and reporting of ethical requirements in clinical trials.M. Ruiz-Canela - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (3):172-176.
Using imprecise probabilities to address the questions of inference and decision in randomized clinical trials.Lyle C. Gurrin, Peter D. Sly & Paul R. Burton - 2002 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 8 (2):255-268.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
25 (#598,332)

6 months
2 (#1,157,335)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Are rcts the gold standard?Nancy Cartwright - 2007 - Biosocieties 1 (1):11-20.

Add more references