Physician Participation in Executions: Care Giver or Executioner?

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (1):95-104 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

To circumvent objections that the death penalty was “cruel and unusual punishment” and therefore a violation of the Eighth Amendment to the Constitution, advocates proposed lethal injection and the involvement of physicians to overcome the negative perceptions associated with the death penalty, and to increase public acceptability of the practice. Initiated in 1982, lethal injection is now the primary method of execution in 37 of the 38 states with the death penalty. “To be exact, this method has been used to kill 788 of the 956 men and women who have been executed in the United States since 1976, when the death penalty was reinstated by the Supreme Court.” More recently, of the 191 executions performed in the United States since 2001, 189 have been by lethal injection.This “medicalization” of the death penalty has ignited a debate, by those within the medical profession and by others outside it, about the appropriateness of physicians participating in executions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Flouting the Demands of Justice? Physician Participation in Executions.Adam Kadlac - 2014 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39 (5):505-522.
Book Reviews. [REVIEW]Marshall B. Kapp & Michael A. Grodin - 1986 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 14 (1):30-33.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-30

Downloads
37 (#407,825)

6 months
6 (#417,196)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Clark
University of Melbourne

References found in this work

Add more references