Ontology, Ethics, and Sentir: Properly Situating Merleau-Ponty

Environmental Values 11 (2):211-225 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Maurice Merleau-Ponty did not author an ethic, and yet it is possible to extend his ontological descriptions to an ethic similar to that espoused by post modern thinkers. It is even possible to distill an environmental ethic, or at least, one of consideration of the more-than-human, from his work. This paper attempts to do some preliminary work in light of this, and lays some groundwork for the future direction of an environmental ethic inspired by a Merleau-Pontian ontology. At the same time, it challenges the popularised view of Merleau-Ponty espoused by David Abram – viz., of Merleau-Ponty as an animist – and properly situates Merleau Ponty.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-29

Downloads
10 (#1,222,590)

6 months
31 (#107,547)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Merleau‐Ponty, Metaphysical Realism and the Natural World1.Simon P. James - 2007 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15 (4):501 – 519.
Perceptual Relations in Digital Environments.Floriana Ferro - 2023 - Foundations of Science 28 (4):1071-1084.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references