Philosophical Quarterly 72 (3):552-577 (2022)

Sam Clarke
University of Pennsylvania
It is often claimed that pre-attentive vision has an ‘iconic’ format. This is seen to explain pre-attentive vision's characteristically high processing capacity and to make sense of an overlap in the mechanisms of early vision and mental imagery. But what does the iconicity of pre-attentive vision amount to? This paper considers two prominent ways of characterising pre-attentive visual icons and argues that neither is adequate: one approach renders the claim ‘pre-attentive vision is iconic’ empirically false while the other obscures its ability to do the explanatory work, which motivates positing pre-attentive visual icons in the first place. With this noted, I introduce the notion of an ‘Analogue Map’ and argue that it provides a superior characterisation of pre-attentive vision's iconicity. I then argue that this forces a reassessment of debates which have traditionally presupposed the iconicity of pre-attentive vision, emphasising ramifications for the viability of a format-based perception-thought border.
Keywords iconic representation  analog representation  format  vision  attention  mental imagery  images  maps
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/pq/pqab054
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Vision.David Marr - 1982 - W. H. Freeman.
Origins of Objectivity.Tyler Burge - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
The Origin of Concepts.Susan Carey - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
Image and Mind.Stephen Michael Kosslyn - 1980 - Harvard University Press.

View all 45 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Is Iconic Memory Iconic?Jake Quilty‐Dunn - 2020 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 101 (3):660-682.
Review of Zenon Pylyshyn's Seeing and Visualizing: It's Not What You Think. [REVIEW]Catharine Abell - 2005 - PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness 11.
The Depictive Nature of Visual Mental Imagery.Norman Yujen Teng - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 35:221-227.
Analog Mental Representation.Jacob Beck - forthcoming - WIREs Cognitive Science.
The History of Vision.Bence Nanay - 2015 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 73 (3):259-271.
Attentive Visual Reference.E. J. Green - 2017 - Mind and Language 32 (1):3-38.
Analog and Digital Representation.Matthew Katz - 2008 - Minds and Machines 18 (3):403-408.


Added to PP index

Total views
209 ( #55,000 of 2,507,561 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
62 ( #13,263 of 2,507,561 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes