Institutional Work and Complicit Decoupling across the U.S. Capital Markets: The Work of Rating Agencies

Business Ethics Quarterly 23 (1):1-30 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX


We focus on the core institution of the capital market and the institu­tional work of professional service firms that provide ratings on corporate issuers, initially in a bid to maintain this institution, which suffered when those involved relied solely on information from the issuers themselves. Through our analysis we identify a new type of decoupling—complicit decoupling. Complicit decoupling evolves over time, beginning with the creation of a new practice, here corporate ratings as a form of policing work, which emerges to help to maintain a core institution. This practice is then adopted, implemented and later becomes decoupled. Exposure does not undermine the legitimacy of the practice because external actors collude in the ‘window dressing’ and, because it has become normalized, only partial repairs are enacted. It is by nature field-level institutional work, benefiting the majority of the field and inherently involves a violation of promise keeping. We conclude with implications for managers and behavioral ethics researchers



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,391

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Meaningful Work and Moral Worth.Christopher Michaelson - 2009 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 28 (1-4):27-48.
Securities market and corporate governance of privatised firms.Viet Ha Hoang - 2006 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 2 (s 3-4):254-279.
Hallucinations and nonsensory correlates of neural activity.Kenneth D. Harris - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):796-796.


Added to PP

17 (#641,569)

6 months
2 (#300,121)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?