Institutional Work and Complicit Decoupling across the U.S. Capital Markets: The Work of Rating Agencies
Business Ethics Quarterly 23 (1):1-30 (2013)
AbstractWe focus on the core institution of the capital market and the institutional work of professional service firms that provide ratings on corporate issuers, initially in a bid to maintain this institution, which suffered when those involved relied solely on information from the issuers themselves. Through our analysis we identify a new type of decoupling—complicit decoupling. Complicit decoupling evolves over time, beginning with the creation of a new practice, here corporate ratings as a form of policing work, which emerges to help to maintain a core institution. This practice is then adopted, implemented and later becomes decoupled. Exposure does not undermine the legitimacy of the practice because external actors collude in the ‘window dressing’ and, because it has become normalized, only partial repairs are enacted. It is by nature field-level institutional work, benefiting the majority of the field and inherently involves a violation of promise keeping. We conclude with implications for managers and behavioral ethics researchers
Similar books and articles
Dialectical Interactions: Decoupling and Integrating Ethics In Ethics Initiatives.Spoma Jovanovic & Roy V. Wood - 2007 - Business Ethics Quarterly 17 (2):217-238.
MNCs and International Accountability Standards Through an Institutional Lens: Evidence of Symbolic Conformity or Decoupling. [REVIEW]Dima Jamali - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 95 (4):617 - 640.
White collars, dirty hands: A grounded neo - institutional theory of misconduct in professional service firms.Pursey P. M. A. R. Heugens, Niki Den Nieuwenboer & M. Kaptein - manuscript
The Enigma of Capital: And the Crises of Capitalism.David Harvey - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
Decoupling as a Fundamental Value of Computer Science.Timothy Colburn & Gary Shute - 2011 - Minds and Machines 21 (2):241-259.
Moral canals: Trust and social capital in the work of Hume, Smith and Genovesi.Luigino Bruni & Robert Sugden - 2000 - Economics and Philosophy 16 (1):21-45.
Getting beyond form filling: The role of institutional governance in human research ethics. [REVIEW]Gary Allen - 2008 - Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (2):105-116.
Meaningful Work and Moral Worth.Christopher Michaelson - 2009 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 28 (1-4):27-48.
Support for grouping-by-synchronization, the context-field, and its mechanisms, but doubt in the use of information theory by the cortex.Reinhard Eckhorn - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):686-687.
Securities market and corporate governance of privatised firms.Viet Ha Hoang - 2006 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 2 (s 3-4):254-279.
Hallucinations and nonsensory correlates of neural activity.Kenneth D. Harris - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):796-796.
Corporate Character: Modern Virtue Ethics and The Virtuous Corporation.Geoff Moore - 2005 - Business Ethics Quarterly 15 (4):659-685.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Authenticity, Power, and Pluralism: A Framework for Understanding Stakeholder Evaluations of Corporate Social Responsibility Activities.Paul F. Skilton & Jill M. Purdy - 2017 - Business Ethics Quarterly 27 (1):99-123.
A Paradox of Ethics: Why People in Good Organizations do Bad Things.Muel Kaptein - forthcoming - Journal of Business Ethics:1-20.
References found in this work
No references found.