Defining the Scope of Casey and Salzman's Application of the Rule of Double Effect to the Therapeutic and Prophylactic Uses of Combined Oral Contraceptives

American Journal of Bioethics 14 (7):35-38 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

No abstract

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Who is entitled to double effect?Joseph Boyle - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (5):475-494.
Aristotle and Double Effect.Ezio Di Nucci - 2014 - Journal of Ancient Philosophy 8 (1):20.
The Danger of Double Effect.Philip A. Reed - 2012 - Christian Bioethics 18 (3):287-300.
Paul Ramsey and the Rule of Double Effect.Sanford S. Levy - 1987 - Journal of Religious Ethics 15 (1):59 - 71.
Some Light on Double Effect.James G. Hanink - 1975 - Analysis 35 (5):147 - 151.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-07-01

Downloads
17 (#742,366)

6 months
2 (#670,035)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Who is entitled to double effect?Joseph Boyle - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (5):475-494.
Medalist’s Address: Action, Intention and ‘Double Effect’.G. E. M. Anscombe - 1982 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 56:12-25.
“Reinventing” the rule of double effect.Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2007 - In Bonnie Steinbock (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics. Oxford University Press. pp. 114--49.
The Role and Responsibility of the Moral Philosopher.G. E. M. Anscombe - 1982 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 56:12-25.

View all 13 references / Add more references