Commentary on J.K O’Regan and A Noe: A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):979-980 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

O'Regan and Noe present a wonderfully detailed and comprehensive defense of a position whose broad outline we absolutely and unreservedly endorse. They are right, it seems to us, to stress the intimacy of conscious content and embodied action, and to counter the idea of a Grand Illusion with the image of an agent genuinely in touch, via active exploration, with the rich and varied visual scene. This is an enormously impressive achievement, and we hope that the comments that follow will be.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-07-22

Downloads
45 (#345,268)

6 months
5 (#629,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Josefa Toribio
Universitat de Barcelona
Andy Clark
University of Sussex

Citations of this work

Understanding action in perception: Replies to Hickerson and Keijzer.Alva Noë - 2007 - Philosophical Psychology 20 (4):531 – 538.
Evolution in action in perception.Fred Keijzer - 2007 - Philosophical Psychology 20 (4):519 – 529.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references