Is Business Ethics Getting Better? A Historical Perspective

Business Ethics Quarterly 21 (2):335-343 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This address uses the question “Is business ethics getting better?” as a heuristic for discussing the importance of history in understanding business and ethics. The paper uses a number of examples to illustrate how the same ethical problems in business have been around for a long time. It describes early attempts at the Harvard Business School to use business history as a means of teaching students about moral and social values. In the end, the author suggests that history may be another way to teach ethics, enrich business ethics courses, and develop the perspective and vision in future business leaders.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 97,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Business Ethics Pioneers: Joanne B. Ciulla.Joanne B. Ciulla - 2021 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 40 (3):295-307.
Business Ethics at the Millennium.R. Edward Freeman - 2000 - Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (1):169-180.
A framework for teaching business ethics.Alfonso R. Oddo - 1997 - Journal of Business Ethics 16 (3):293-297.
Are University Professors Qualified to Teach Ethics?Bruce Anderson - 2003 - Journal of Academic Ethics 1 (2):217-219.
American business values: a global perspective.Gerald F. Cavanagh - 2006 - Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
Faith and Ethics at Work.Joe Blosser - 2019 - Journal of Business Ethics Education 16:41-61.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-01

Downloads
330 (#72,685)

6 months
8 (#822,936)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joanne B Ciulla
Rutgers University - Newark

References found in this work

Rights and Interests in a Participatory Market Society.Henk van Luijk - 1994 - Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (1):79-96.

Add more references