Teaching Phenomenology by Way of “Second-Person Perspectivity” (From My Thirty Years at the University of Dallas)

Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology 12 (sup3):1-14 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Phenomenology has remained a sheltering place for those who would seek to understand not only their own “first person” experiences but also the first person experiences of others. Recent publications by renowned scholars within the field have clarified and extended our possibilities of access to “first person” experience by means of perception (Lingis, 2007) and reflection (Zahavi, 2005). Teaching phenomenology remains a challenge, however, because one must find ways of communicating to the student how to embody it as a process rather than simply to learn about it as a content area. Another challenge issues from the fact that most writings on applied phenomenology emphasize individual subjectivity as the central focus, while offering only indirect access to the subjectivity of others (for example, by way of analyzing written descriptions provided by the individual under study). While one finds in the literature of psychotherapy plentiful elucidations of the “we-experience” within which therapists form impressions of their clients’ experience, there is still need for a more thoughtful clarification of our rather special personal modes of access to the experience of others in everyday life. This paper will present “second person perspectivity” as a mode of resonating with the expressions of others and will describe class activities that can bring students closer to a lived understanding of what it means to be doing phenomenology in the face of the other.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Evidence and Argument in Phenomenological Research.Russell Walsh - 2012 - Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology 12 (sup1):1-7.
Models, Theories, and Structures: Thirty Years on.Steven French - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (S1):S116 - S127.
Phenomenology: Neither auto- nor hetero- be.John J. Drummond - 2007 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6 (1-2):57-74.
In favor of (plain) phenomenology.Charles Siewert - 2007 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6 (1-2):201-220.
The View from a Wheelchair.Jeffrey P. Whitman - 2007 - Teaching Philosophy 30 (4):345-356.
Traditional Catholic philosophy: baby and bathwater.James Franklin - 2006 - In Michael Whelan (ed.), Issues for Church and Society in Australia. Sydney, Australia: St Pauls. pp. 15-32.
Ethical issues in teaching.Michael Cholbi - 2013 - International Encyclopedia of Ethics.
Finding the Noema.Dallas Willard - 2010 - In J. J. Drummond & Lester Embree (eds.), The Phenomenology of the Noema. Springer.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-19

Downloads
27 (#506,960)

6 months
5 (#247,092)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Scott D. Churchill
University of Dallas

References found in this work

Phenomenology of Perception.Maurice Merleau-Ponty - 1945 - New York: Routledge. Edited by Donald A. Landes.
Phenomenology of Perception.Maurice Merleau-Ponty - 1962 - New York: Routledge. Edited by Donald A. Landes.
Phenomenology of Perception.Maurice Merleau-Ponty - 1962 - New York: Routledge. Edited by Donald A. Landes.
The Visible and the Invisible: Followed by Working Notes.Maurice Merleau-Ponty - 1968 - Evanston [Ill.]: Northwestern University Press. Edited by Claude Lefort.

View all 38 references / Add more references