- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Personal utility is inherent to direct-to-consumer genomic testing
Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (10):649-652 (2016)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Direct to consumer testing in reproductive contexts – should health professionals be concerned?Heather Skirton - 2015 - Life Sciences, Society and Policy 11 (1):1-9.
Informed Consent in Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genome Testing: The Outline of A Model between Specific and Generic Consent.Eline M. Bunnik, A. Cecile J. W. Janssens & Maartje H. N. Schermer - 2013 - Bioethics 27 (3):343-351.
Personal utility in genomic testing: is there such a thing?Eline M. Bunnik, A. Cecile J. W. Janssens & Maartje H. N. Schermer - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (4):322-326.
‘Just a Bit of Fun’: How Recreational is Direct-to-Customer Genetic Testing?Heike Felzmann - 2015 - The New Bioethics 21 (1):20-32.
Direct-to-Consumer Genomics Companies Should Provide Guidance to Their Customers on (Not) Sharing Personal Genomic Information.Nanibaa’ A. Garrison & Amy L. Non - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (11):55-57.
The ethical challenges of direct-to-consumer genetic testing.Cheryl Berg & Kelly Fryer-Edwards - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 77 (1):17 - 31.
The New Genetics and Informed Consent: Differentiating Choice to Preserve Autonomy.Eline M. Bunnik, Antina Jong, Niels Nijsingh & Guido M. W. R. Wert - 2013 - Bioethics 27 (6):348-355.
Challenges in the Use of Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genome Testing in Children.Holly K. Tabor & Maureen Kelley - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6-7):32-34.
Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genome Testing: The Problem Is Not Ignorance–It Is Market Failure.Christopher F. C. Jordens, Ian H. Kerridge & Gabrielle N. Samuel - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6-7):13-15.
On Ordinal Utility, Cardinal Utility and Random Utility.Richard Batley - 2008 - Theory and Decision 64 (1):37-63.
Revealed preference tests for consistency with weakly separable indirect utility.Per Hjertstrand & James L. Swofford - 2012 - Theory and Decision 72 (2):245-256.
Swabbing Students: Should Universities Be Allowed to Facilitate Educational DNA Testing?Shawneequa L. Callier - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (4):32-40.
Is There a Right Time to Know?: The Right Not to Know and Genetic Testing in Children.Pascal Borry, Mahsa Shabani & Heidi Carmen Howard - 2014 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 42 (1):19-27.
Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: How the Promise of a Personalised Approach is Being Squandered.H. Belt - unknown
Genomic Testing and Genomic Care: Are They Talking to Each Other?Julian Barwell & Anirudh Kumar - 2015 - Journal of Clinical Research and Bioethics 6 (6).
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-06-03
Downloads
35 (#445,257)
6 months
4 (#790,687)
2016-06-03
Downloads
35 (#445,257)
6 months
4 (#790,687)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Genes wide open: Data sharing and the social gradient of genomic privacy.Tobias Haeusermann, Marta Fadda, Alessandro Blasimme, Bastian Greshake Tzovaras & Effy Vayena - forthcoming - AJOB Empirical Bioethics:1-15.
On the personal utility of Alzheimer’s disease-related biomarker testing in the research context.Eline M. Bunnik, Edo Richard, Richard Milne & Maartje H. N. Schermer - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (12):830-834.
“I would rather have it done by a doctor”—laypeople’s perceptions of direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTC GT) and its ethical implications.Manuel Schaper, Sabine Wöhlke & Silke Schicktanz - 2019 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 22 (1):31-40.
Direct to consumer genetic testing and the libertarian right to test.Wendy Elizabeth Bonython & Bruce Baer Arnold - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (11):787-789.
Moral motivation regarding dementia risk testing among affected persons in Germany and Israel.Zümrüt Alpinar-Sencan, Silke Schicktanz, Natalie Ulitsa, Daphna Shefet & Perla Werner - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 48 (11):861-867.
References found in this work
Direct-to-consumer genomics on the scales of autonomy.Effy Vayena - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (4):310-314.
Personal utility in genomic testing: is there such a thing?Eline M. Bunnik, A. Cecile J. W. Janssens & Maartje H. N. Schermer - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (4):322-326.
Integrity, the self, and desire-based accounts of the good.Robert Noggle - 1999 - Philosophical Studies 96 (3):301-328.
Revealing the results of whole-genome sequencing and whole-exome sequencing in research and clinical investigations: some ethical issues: Table 1.Nina Hallowell, Alison Hall, Corinna Alberg & Ron Zimmern - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (4):317-321.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-pp8v9 uwo