Braintrust: What Neuroscience Tells Us About Morality

Princeton University Press (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What is morality? Where does it come from? And why do most of us heed its call most of the time? In Braintrust, neurophilosophy pioneer Patricia Churchland argues that morality originates in the biology of the brain. She describes the "neurobiological platform of bonding" that, modified by evolutionary pressures and cultural values, has led to human styles of moral behavior. The result is a provocative genealogy of morals that asks us to reevaluate the priority given to religion, absolute rules, and pure reason in accounting for the basis of morality. Moral values, Churchland argues, are rooted in a behavior common to all mammals--the caring for offspring. The evolved structure, processes, and chemistry of the brain incline humans to strive not only for self-preservation but for the well-being of allied selves--first offspring, then mates, kin, and so on, in wider and wider "caring" circles. Separation and exclusion cause pain, and the company of loved ones causes pleasure; responding to feelings of social pain and pleasure, brains adjust their circuitry to local customs. In this way, caring is apportioned, conscience molded, and moral intuitions instilled. A key part of the story is oxytocin, an ancient body-and-brain molecule that, by decreasing the stress response, allows humans to develop the trust in one another necessary for the development of close-knit ties, social institutions, and morality. A major new account of what really makes us moral, Braintrust challenges us to reconsider the origins of some of our most cherished values

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Meaning of Mind: Language, Morality, and Neuroscience.Thomas Szasz - 1996 - Westport, Conn.: Syracuse University Press.
The Inner Morality of Private Law.Benjamin C. Zipursky - 2013 - American Journal of Jurisprudence 58 (1):27-44.
The end of plasticity.Herman Philipse - 1997 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 40 (3):291-306.
Neuroscience and Morality.Bernard Gert - 2012 - Hastings Center Report 42 (3):22-28.
and Morality.Zachary Stein & Kurt W. Fischer - 2011 - In Kathryn E. Patten & Stephen R. Campbell (eds.), Educational neuroscience. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 23--55.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-09

Downloads
43 (#351,093)

6 months
20 (#118,588)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Patricia Churchland
University of California, San Diego

Citations of this work

The definition of morality.Bernard Gert - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Can we program or train robots to be good?Amanda Sharkey - 2020 - Ethics and Information Technology 22 (4):283-295.
Should we welcome robot teachers?Amanda J. C. Sharkey - 2016 - Ethics and Information Technology 18 (4):283-297.

View all 84 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references