The impact of factitious disorder on the physician-patient relationship. An epistemological model

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (3):253-261 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Theoretical models for physician-patient communication in clinical practice are described in literature, but none of them seems adequate for solving the communication problem in clinical practice that emerges in case of factitious disorder. Theoretical models generally imply open communication and respect for the autonomy of the patient. In factitious disorder, the physician is confronted by lies and (self)destructive behaviour of the patient, who in one way or another tries to involve the physician in this behaviour. It is no longer controversial that the physician should communicate his consideration of a factitious disorder without insistence that the patient accepts this diagnosis. However, the balance between patient autonomy and open communication on the one hand, and the preservation of the patient's health, physician integrity and of a constructive physician-patient relationship on the other is easily disrupted. In this article, an epistemological model is described to facilitate a positive outcome of confrontation in treatment of factitious disorder. Analysing the problem in terms of systems theory will help the physician to assess what information is appropriate to use in which phase of the patient's treatment, while preserving the physician-patient relationship

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,907

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Patient autonomy in emergency medicine.Anne-Cathrine Naess, Reidun Foerde & Petter Andreas Steen - 2001 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (1):71-77.
Physician and patient: Respect for mutuality.David Gary Smith & Lisa H. Newton - 1984 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 5 (1).
Informed consent: Patient's right or patient's duty?Richard T. Hull - 1985 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (2):183-198.
Patients and profits.Mark Yarborough - 1986 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 7 (1).
The doctor–patient relationship.Harry H. Gordon - 1983 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 8 (3):243-256.
The Noncompliant Patient: A Kantian and Levinasian Response.P. Burcher - 2012 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (1):74-89.
Competition and the patient-centered ethic.George W. Rainbolt - 1987 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 12 (1):85-99.
Commentary: What we have here, is a failure to communicate.Howard Brody - 1999 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (1):28 – 33.
What does a `right' to physician-assisted suicide (PAS) legally entail?M. T. Harvey - 2002 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 23 (4-5):271-286.
Beyond Informed Consent - Part I.Kate Jones - 2007 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 13 (2):4.
Patient-physician relationship.Ratna Dutta Sharma & Sashinungla (eds.) - 2007 - New Delhi: D.K. Printworld.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-31

Downloads
68 (#244,717)

6 months
6 (#581,938)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations