A Political Theory of Blackmail: A Reply to Professor Dripps [Book Review]

Criminal Law and Philosophy 3 (3):261-269 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay was originally presented at the Rutgers Institute for Law and Philosophy as part of the Symposium on The Evolution of Criminal Law Theory. It is a Reply to Professor Donald Dripps’ politically-based justification for blackmail’s prohibition. Under Dripps’ account, by exacting payment from the victim blackmail is an impermissible form of private punishment that usurps the state’s public monopoly on law enforcement. This essay demonstrates that Dripps’ account is either under-inclusive or over-inclusive or both. Dripps’ account is applied to a number of the standard blackmail scenarios by which theories of blackmail are typically assessed. Dripps’ account is under-inclusive by failing to treat as blackmail Victim-Welcomed Blackmail, Non-Monetary Blackmail, Rebuffed Blackmail, and Non-Informational Blackmail which the law considers as blackmail. And it is over-inclusive by treating as blackmail Victim-Initiated Exchange and Unconditional Disclosure which the law does not recognize as blackmail.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,594

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Another Look at Moral Blackmail.Lawrence Alexander - 1984 - Philosophy Research Archives 10:189-196.
The Second Paradox of Blackmail.Hans-Hermann Hoppe - 2000 - Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (3):593-622.
Blackmail.Mitchell Berman - 2011 - In John Deigh & David Dolinko (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of the Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.
Blackmail.Jeffrie G. Murphy - 1980 - The Monist 63 (2):156-171.
Should Blackmail Be Banned?David Owens - 1988 - Philosophy 63 (246):501 - 514.
Why Blackmail Should Be Banned.Hugh Evans - 1990 - Philosophy 65 (251):89 - 94.
Liberalism and the Paradox of Blackmail.Michael Gorr - 1992 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 21 (1):43-66.
Moral Blackmail.Terrance C. McConnell - 1981 - Ethics 91 (4):544-567.
There Is No Paradox of Blackmail.Michael Clark - 1994 - Analysis 54 (1):54 - 61.
The Crime of Blackmail: A Libertarian Critique.Walter Block - 1999 - Criminal Justice Ethics 18 (2):3-10.
In Defense of Blackmail.Eric Mack - 1982 - Philosophical Studies 41 (2):273 - 284.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
26 (#443,731)

6 months
1 (#418,924)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?