Unsecularizing history and politics: Jayne Svenungsson and Karl Löwith on meaning in history

International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 82 (2):176-192 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The debate about secularization in recent decades has challenged long-held assumptions about Western modernity and the purported decline of religion in modern societies. However, the impact of this criticism on the idea of history has so far not received as much attention as it deserves. Jayne Svenungsson’s analysis of the influence of biblical motives on contemporary political theology illustrates one way in which the concept of history might be rethought in the wake of the crisis of the secularization thesis. In dialogue with Karl Löwith’s classical argument that modern philosophy of history and the idea of historical progress are secularized versions of Christian eschatology, she argues that the prophetic vision of history as a struggle for a justice that supersedes every current law or moral system is a viable and promising alternative that ought to be considered in contemporary discussions of politics and history. Svenungsson’s analysis thus amounts to what one might call a postsecular challenge to a secular historical discourse.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Ethos of History: Time and Responsibility.Stefan Helgesson & Jayne Svenungsson (eds.) - 2018 - [New York, New York]: Berghahn Books.
Meaning in history.Karl Löwith - 1949 - [Chicago]: Univ. of Chicago Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-05-09

Downloads
18 (#811,325)

6 months
7 (#411,886)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations