Contraception 106 (2022)

Authors
Christopher ChoGlueck
New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
Abstract
This commentary defends 3 arguments for changing the label of levonorgestrel-based emergency contraception (LNG EC) so that it no longer supports the possibility of a mechanism of action after fertilization. First, there is no direct scientific evidence confirming any postfertilization mechanisms. Second, despite the weight of evidence, there is still widespread public misunderstanding over the mechanism of LNG EC. Third, this FDA label is not a value-free claim, but instead it has functioned like a political tool for reducing contraceptive access. The label is laden with antiabortion values (even though EC is contraception, not abortion), and it imposes these values on potential users, resulting in barriers to access such as with Burwell v. Hobby Lobby. These 3 arguments together provide scientific, social, and ethical grounds for the FDA to take the initiate in changing Plan B's drug label.
Keywords contraception  Drug label   Emergency contraception  Levonorgestrel  Mechanism of action  Patient understanding  US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)  values in science
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,018
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

DRUG FACTS, VALUES, AND THE MORNING-AFTER PILL.Christopher ChoGlueck - 2021 - Public Affairs Quarterly 35 (1):51-82.
Speaking Off Label.Stephen R. Latham - 2010 - Hastings Center Report 40 (6):9-10.
Plan B Agonistics.Thomas J. Davis - 2010 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 10 (4):741-772.
Emergency Contraception and Conscientious Objection.J. Paul Kelleher - 2010 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (3):290-304.
Conscientious Objection and Emergency Contraception.Robert F. Card - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (6):8 – 14.
Emergency Contraception: Legal Consequences of Medical Classification.Elizabeth Gerber - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (2):428-431.
Corrigendum.Jennifer C. Nash - 2018 - Feminist Theory 19 (1):NP1-NP1.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-12-30

Total views
10 ( #895,912 of 2,498,301 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #73,117 of 2,498,301 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes