Temporal delays, not underactivation of detection processes may be responsible for neglect

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):675-676 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We have shown that FEF lesion-induced extinction could be compensated for by changing the relative temporal onsets of two targets presented on either side of the midline. Monkeys were trained to make saccades to either of two identical visual stimuli presented with various stimulus onset asynchronies (SOA). In intact animals the targets were chosen with equal probability when they appeared simultaneously. After unilateral FEF lesions an SOA of 67–116 msec had to be introduced, with the contralesional target appearing first, to obtain equal probability choice. With a smaller target separation, averaging saccades occurred with highest frequency at similar SOAs. Our findings suggest that neglect may be attributable to more time being required in the damaged hemisphere for converting sensory information into motor responses.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The ontology of neglect.Cristina Becchio & Cesare Bertone - 2005 - Consciousness and Cognition 14 (3):483-494.
Visuomotor processing in unilateral neglect.Marlene Behrmann & Daniel V. Meegan - 1998 - Consciousness and Cognition 7 (3):381-409.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
38 (#398,871)

6 months
6 (#431,022)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references