Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 62:19-25 (2018)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
In this work, I attempt to develop what I call a co-evolutionary model of scientific change, which I expect to afford a more balanced view on both the continuous and discontinuous aspects of scientific change. Supposing that scientific goals, methods and theories constitute the main components of scientific inquiry, I focus on the relationships among these components and their changing patterns. First of all, I identify explanatory power and empirical adequacy as primary goals of science and explore the possibility of evaluating scientific goals. Then I try to bring out the major features of how the main components of science are related to each other. One major feature is that they mutually constrain each other, and as such each main component operates as a selective force on the other components. Another major feature is that the main components of science induce changes reciprocally, but with certain intervals. Other important features are the modes and tempos of changes in the main components of scientific inquiry. All these features together, I conclude, suggest that scientific change is evolutionary, as well as co-evolutionary. Finally I argue that this co-evolutionary model of scientific change does not yield to what I call the problems of circularity and scientific progress.
|
Keywords | Conference Proceedings Contemporary Philosophy |
Categories |
No categories specified (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | 978-1-63435-038-9 |
DOI | 10.5840/wcp232018621408 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Is Evolutionary Epistemology of Science Compatible with Scientific Realism.Ivan Kuzin - 2015 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 46 (4):163-179.
Scientific Change as an Evolutionary, Information Process: Its Structural, Conceptual and Cultural Elements.Fatin Khalil Ismail Al-Bustany - 1989 - Dissertation, Georgetown University
The Evolution of Scientific Lineages.Michael Bradie - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:245 - 254.
Conceptual Change and Evolutionary Developmental Biology.A. C. Love - 2015 - In Conceptual Change in Biology: Scientific and Philosophical Perspectives on Evolution and Development. Springer. pp. 1-54.
Kuhn, Relativism and Realism.Howard Sankey - 2018 - In Juha Saatsi (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Scientific Realism. London and New York: Routledge. pp. 72-83.
Scientific Problems: Three Empiricist Models.Thomas Nickles - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:3 - 19.
Barriers and Models: Comments on Margolis and Giere.Nancy J. Nersessian - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:441 - 444.
A Cognitive Perspective on Scientific Realism.Michael Vlerick - 2019 - Philosophical Psychology 32 (8):1157-1178.
Understanding Scientific Study Via Process Modeling.Robert W. P. Luk - 2010 - Foundations of Science 15 (1):49-78.
Descriptions of Scientific Revolutions: Rorty’s Failure at Redescribing Scientific Progress.Kyle Cavagnini - 2012 - Stance 5:31-43.
Kuhn’s Social Epistemology and the Sociology of Science.K. Brad Wray - 2015 - In Alisa Bokulich & William J. Devlin (eds.), Kuhn's Structure of Scientific Revolutions - 50 Years On. Springer. pp. 167-183.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2020-05-08
Total views
3 ( #1,353,697 of 2,499,776 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,066 of 2,499,776 )
2020-05-08
Total views
3 ( #1,353,697 of 2,499,776 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,066 of 2,499,776 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads