Dissertation, Korea University (2019)
Authors | |
Abstract |
In this dissertation, we shall investigate whether Tennant's criterion for paradoxicality(TCP) can be a correct criterion for genuine paradoxes and whether the requirement of a normal derivation(RND) can be a proof-theoretic solution to the paradoxes. Tennant’s criterion has two types of counterexamples. The one is a case which raises the problem of overgeneration that TCP makes a paradoxical derivation non-paradoxical. The other is one which generates the problem of undergeneration that TCP renders a non-paradoxical derivation paradoxical. Chapter 2 deals with the problem of undergeneration and Chapter 3 concerns the problem of overgeneration. Chapter 2 discusses that Tenant’s diagnosis of the counterexample which applies CR−rule and causes the undergeneration problem is not correct and presents a solution to the problem of undergeneration. Chapter 3 argues that Tennant’s diagnosis of the counterexample raising the overgeneration problem is wrong and
provides a solution to the problem. Finally, Chapter 4 addresses what should be explicated in order for RND to be a proof-theoretic solution to the paradoxes.
|
Keywords | paradox proof theory neil tennant dag prawitz proof-theoretic criterion for paradoxicality non-terminating reduction sequences |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
In Contradiction: A Study of the Transconsistent.Graham Priest - 1987 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Oxford University Press.
Natural Deduction: A Proof-Theoretical Study.Dag Prawitz - 1965 - Stockholm, Sweden: Dover Publications.
View all 54 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
The Identity of Proofs and the Criterion for Admissible Reductions.Seungrak Choi - 2021 - Korean Journal of Logic 3 (24):245-280.
Similar books and articles
How to Ekman a Crabbé-Tennant.Peter Schroeder-Heister & Luca Tranchini - 2018 - Synthese 199 (Suppl 3):617-639.
Normalizability, Cut Eliminability and Paradox.Neil Tennant - 2016 - Synthese 199 (Suppl 3):597-616.
Ekman’s Paradox.Peter Schroeder-Heister & Luca Tranchini - 2017 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 58 (4):567-581.
Proof-Theoretic Semantics, Paradoxes and the Distinction Between Sense and Denotation.Luca Tranchini - forthcoming - Journal of Logic and Computation 2014.
Validity Concepts in Proof-Theoretic Semantics.Peter Schroeder-Heister - 2006 - Synthese 148 (3):525-571.
Against Harmony.Ian Rumfitt - forthcoming - In Bob Hale, Crispin Wright & Alexander Miller (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to the Philosophy of Language. Blackwell.
Manifest Invalidity: Neil Tennant's New Argument for Intuitionism.Jon Cogburn - 2003 - Synthese 134 (3):353 - 362.
Manifest Invalidity: Neil Tennant's New Argument for Intuitionism.Jon Cogburn - 2003 - Synthese 134 (3):353-362.
Incompleteness of Intuitionistic Propositional Logic with Respect to Proof-Theoretic Semantics.Thomas Piecha & Peter Schroeder-Heister - 2019 - Studia Logica 107 (1):233-246.
Existence, Freedom, Identity, and the Logic of Abstractionist Realism.Peter Milne - 2007 - Mind 116 (461):23-53.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2020-08-02
Total views
139 ( #82,950 of 2,498,786 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #46,526 of 2,498,786 )
2020-08-02
Total views
139 ( #82,950 of 2,498,786 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #46,526 of 2,498,786 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads