Beyond Modern Scientism and Postmodern Relativism: Therapeutic Methods of Wittgenstein and Chuang Tzu

Dissertation, Fuller Theological Seminary, Doctor of Ministry Program (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The purpose of this dissertation is to show that there are resources in the writings of both Ludwig Wittgenstein and Chuang Tzu for a third position that is neither modern-style absolutism nor postmodern relativism. This discussion focused on exploring a philosophical approach to overcome the limits of both modern scientism and postmodern relativism, by applying the methods of Wittgenstein and Chuang Tzu, in the post-Enlightenment intellectual context. For this goal I suggested a re-interpretation of Wittgenstein and Chuang Tzu. In this discussion Wittgenstein's method of ubersehen and Chuang Tzu's methods for attaining to a multidimensional comprehensive perspective shows a means to avoid the two extremes of scientism and relativism and also a proposal for overcoming incommensurability. ;This dissertation has three parts. ;In part 1, I argued that Wittgenstein pursued an ethical vision, and for his goal he showed the limits of scientism insofar as scientism is assumed to be based on the firm foundation of mathematics and science. In Wittgenstein's view, the absolute firm foundations of mathematics and science are in fact conventional "language-games" and "forms of life." Through his notion of the "language-game" he demolished the absolute foundation of science and mathematics. ;Part 2 argued how the ancient Chinese philosopher Chuang Tzu suggested the method of a multidimensional comprehensive perspective to overcome the problems of both relativism and what postmodern critics would identify as foundationalism. For this goal I re-interpret Chuang Tzu and suggested that his notion of the "Tao Pivot" shows us a way to overcome the limits of context-oriented relativism. ;Part 3 applied Wittgenstein and Chuang Tzu's methods to overcome the limits of radical postmodern relativism, especially the problem of incommensurability. In Wittgenstein's view, if we achieve the viewpoint of ubersehen , we can dissolve the source of the problem---incommensurable understanding, or incommensurable ways of seeing. Wittgenstein's notion of ubersehen can be linked to Chuang Tzu's multidimensional perspective. Taken together they can provide a means to overcome the limits of radical relativism

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Wittgenstein and relativism.Paul O'Grady - 2004 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 12 (3):315-337.
Wittgensteinian foundationalism.Duncan Richter - 2001 - Erkenntnis 55 (3):349–358.
The Later Wittgenstein's Humanism and the Question of Moral Justification.Eric Bruce Litwack - 2000 - Dissertation, Queen's University at Kingston (Canada)
Was Wittgenstein an epistemic relativist?Annalisa Coliva - 2009 - Philosophical Investigations 33 (1):1-23.
Wittgenstein's Concept of a Language-Game.Ronald Frank Bienert - 1996 - Dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada)
A Quite Different System of Payment.Andrew J. Peach - 2006 - Journal of Philosophical Research 31:249-275.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references