Abstraction and Theories of Lei : A Response to Chad Hansen's Mereological Interpretation of Ancient Chinese Philosophy

Dissertation, University of Hawai'i (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

My aim in this dissertation is to challenge Chad Hansen's mereological interpretation of ancient Chinese philosophy by providing my own interpretation based on theories of lei. Hansen's mereological interpretation is composed of two radical claims: One is to say that since ancient Chinese philosophy is dominated by nominalism, we do not have to introduce any abstract entities in interpreting ancient Chinese philosophy. The other is to say that Chinese nominalism is mereological. ;Against Hansen's first claim, I argue that since nominalism does not always go along with the non-committment of abstract entities and ancient Chinese philosophy show the committment to abstract entities despite its nominalistic trend, we need to introduce abstract entities in our interpretation of ancient Chinese philosophy. Against Hansen's second claim, I argue that Chinese nominalism is based on theories of lei instead of mereology. Chinese lei-based nominalism is more like traditional forms of Western nominalism in that it is the scheme of individuals/similarities-among-individuals and that it emphasizes the conventional characteristics of determining similarity. Nevertheless, this dissertation prefers the Chinese term "lei" instead of the Western term "similarity" because the former better discloses Chinese contexts without unnecessary Western imposition. ;My lei-based interpretation is suggested with regard to three realms. These realms are linguistic features of Classical Chinese, theories of language in ancient China, and philosophical doctrines in ancient China. ;A close examination on linguistic features of Classical Chinese shows that these features simply disclose the conventional characteristics of Chinese characters, the pragmatics--priority conception of language, and individual/similarity semantical scheme, not the mereological scheme. In my discussion of theories of language in ancient China, I claim that besides Hansen's four Chinese assumptions about language , we also should emphasize the relativity of language, the articulatory nature of language, and the semantic role of lei as typical Chinese assumptions about language. All of these Chinese assumptions show why lei came to play a central role in Chinese theories of language. Lastly, I examine not only Hansen's favorite example which he uses to support his interpretation: Gongsun Long's white horse paradox, but also Mencian theory of human nature and Neo-Mohist theory of disputation, in order to show that lei was a theory of classification extensively discussed among ancient Chinese philosophers

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ancient chinese theories of language.Chad D. Hansen - 1975 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 2 (3):245-283.
How Chinese Thought “Shapes” Western Thought.Chad Hansen - 2001 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 12:25-40.
Mass nouns and "a white horse is not a horse".Chad D. Hansen - 1976 - Philosophy East and West 26 (2):189-209.
Language and ontology in early chinese thought.Chris Fraser - 2007 - Philosophy East and West 57 (4):420-456.
Semantics without Truth in Later Mohist Philosophy of Language.Frank Saunders - 2014 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 13 (2):215-229.
The Semantic Concept of Truth in Pre-Han Chinese Philosophy.Wai Ch'un1 Leong - 2015 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 14 (1):55-74.
Language and Logic in Ancient China.Chad Hansen - 1983 - University of Michigan Press.
Theories of family in ancient chinese philosophy.Zailin Zhang - 2009 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (3):343-359.
The Philosophy of the Ancient Chinese Mathematician Liu Hui.Xiu Liu - 1998 - Philosophy and Culture 25 (7):652-659.
Conceptions of intelligence in ancient Chinese philosophy.Shih-Ying Yang & Robert J. Sternberg - 1997 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 17 (2):101-119.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-02

Downloads
1 (#1,769,934)

6 months
1 (#1,040,386)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Chaehyun Chong
Sogang University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references