On the Concept of “Radical Understanding”

Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 21:25-30 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

“Radical understanding” – an expression recalling Quine’s “radical translation” and Davidson’s “radical interpretation” – concerns that necessary presupposition of every understanding that is shown in extreme cases of indecipherability. Such a minimum content consists in understanding an existence. Indeed, Heideggerian ontological hermeneutics has weaved together understanding and existence to the point that it is possible to establish an analogy between the existential analysis and the several grades of text decipherability: the passage from the inauthentic to the authentic existence can be read as a passage from the semantic (radical interpretation) to the syntactic (radical translation) and to the ontological level (radical understanding). The level of radical understanding is the one in which the minimal content of understanding coincides with its formal condition of possibility, in which understanding is to understand an existence.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Divine Revelation and Human Person.Balázs M. Mezei - 2006 - Philosophy and Theology 18 (2):337-354.
A defense of intuitions.S. Matthew Liao - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 140 (2):247 - 262.
Two Models of Radical Revelation in Austrian Philosophy.Balazs Mezei - 2009 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 1 (1):99 - 120.
Distinguishing WV Quine and Donald Davidson.James Pearson - 2011 - Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 1 (1):1-22.
Radical externalism.Ted Honderich - 2006 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (7-8):3-13.
Experience, Reason, and the Virtues: On William James's Reinstatement of the Vague.Jacob L. Goodson - 2010 - American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 31 (3):243-258.
Neuron doctrine: Trivial versus radical versus do not dichotomize.Barry Horwitz - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):839-840.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-04

Downloads
44 (#353,833)

6 months
9 (#295,075)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gaetano Chiurazzi
Università degli Studi di Torino

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references