Levinas

Ann Chinnery

dx.doi.org

Levinas

In Ann Chinnery, Nuraan Davids, Naomi Hodgson, Kai Horsthemke, Viktor Johansson, Dirk Willem Postma, Claudia W. Ruitenberg, Paul Smeyers, Christiane Thompson, Joris Vlieghe, Hanan Alexander, Joop Berding, Charles Bingham, Michael Bonnett, David Bridges, Malte Brinkmann, Brian A. Brown, Carsten Bünger, Nicholas C. Burbules, Rita Casale, M. Victoria Costa, Brian Coyne, Renato Huarte Cuéllar, Stefaan E. Cuypers, Johan Dahlbeck, Suzanne de Castell, Doret de Ruyter, Samantha Deane, Sarah J. DesRoches, Eduardo Duarte, Denise Egéa, Penny Enslin, Oren Ergas, Lynn Fendler, Sheron Fraser-Burgess, Norm Friesen, Amanda Fulford, Heather Greenhalgh-Spencer, Stefan Herbrechter, Chris Higgins, Pádraig Hogan, Katariina Holma, Liz Jackson, Ronald B. Jacobson, Jennifer Jenson, Kerstin Jergus, Clarence W. Joldersma, Mark E. Jonas, Zdenko Kodelja, Wendy Kohli, Anna Kouppanou, Heikki A. Kovalainen, Lesley Le Grange, David Lewin, Tyson E. Lewis, Gerard Lum, Niclas Månsson, Christopher Martin & Jan Masschelein (eds.), International Handbook of Philosophy of Education. Springer Verlag. pp. 259-268 (2018)

@incollection{Chinnery2018-CHIL-6,
	author = {Ann Chinnery},
	booktitle = {International Handbook of Philosophy of Education},
	editor = {Ann Chinnery and Nuraan Davids and Naomi Hodgson and Kai Horsthemke and Viktor Johansson and Dirk Willem Postma and Claudia W. Ruitenberg and Paul Smeyers and Christiane Thompson and Joris Vlieghe and Hanan Alexander and Joop Berding and Charles Bingham and Michael Bonnett and David Bridges and Malte Brinkmann and Brian A. Brown and Carsten B\"{u}nger and Nicholas C. Burbules and Rita Casale and M. Victoria Costa and Brian Coyne and Renato Huarte Cu\'{e}llar and Stefaan E. Cuypers and Johan Dahlbeck and Suzanne de Castell and Doret de Ruyter and Samantha Deane and Sarah J. DesRoches and Eduardo Duarte and Denise Eg\'{e}a and Penny Enslin and Oren Ergas and Lynn Fendler and Sheron Fraser{-}Burgess and Norm Friesen and Amanda Fulford and Heather Greenhalgh{-}Spencer and Stefan Herbrechter and Chris Higgins and P\'{a}draig Hogan and Katariina Holma and Liz Jackson and Ronald B. Jacobson and Jennifer Jenson and Kerstin Jergus and Clarence W. Joldersma and Mark E. Jonas and Zdenko Kodelja and Wendy Kohli and Anna Kouppanou and Heikki A. Kovalainen and Lesley Le Grange and David Lewin and Tyson E. Lewis and Gerard Lum and Niclas M\a{a}nsson and Christopher Martin and Jan Masschelein},
	pages = {259--268},
	publisher = {Springer Verlag},
	title = {Levinas},
	year = {2018}
}

Chinnery, Ann (2018). Levinas. In Ann Chinnery, Nuraan Davids, Naomi Hodgson, Kai Horsthemke, Viktor Johansson, Dirk Willem Postma, Claudia W. Ruitenberg, Paul Smeyers, Christiane Thompson, Joris Vlieghe, Hanan Alexander, Joop Berding, Charles Bingham, Michael Bonnett, David Bridges, Malte Brinkmann, Brian A. Brown, Carsten Bünger, Nicholas C. Burbules, Rita Casale, M. Victoria Costa, Brian Coyne, Renato Huarte Cuéllar, Stefaan E. Cuypers, Johan Dahlbeck, Suzanne de Castell, Doret de Ruyter, Samantha Deane, Sarah J. DesRoches, Eduardo Duarte, Denise Egéa, Penny Enslin, Oren Ergas, Lynn Fendler, Sheron Fraser-Burgess, Norm Friesen, Amanda Fulford, Heather Greenhalgh-Spencer, Stefan Herbrechter, Chris Higgins, Pádraig Hogan, Katariina Holma, Liz Jackson, Ronald B. Jacobson, Jennifer Jenson, Kerstin Jergus, Clarence W. Joldersma, Mark E. Jonas, Zdenko Kodelja, Wendy Kohli, Anna Kouppanou, Heikki A. Kovalainen, Lesley Le Grange, David Lewin, Tyson E. Lewis, Gerard Lum, Niclas Månsson, Christopher Martin & Jan Masschelein (eds.), International Handbook of Philosophy of Education. Springer Verlag. pp. 259-268.

Copy BIBT_EX

Abstract

This chapter explores the ways in which Emmanuel Levinas’s account of heteronomous subjectivity contributes to ongoing debates on autonomy as an educational aim. I first highlight some key points in Levinas’s scholarly life. I then sketch his account of heteronomous subjectivity and provide a brief overview of arguments for and against autonomy as an educational aim. In the last section I explore how Levinas’s work helps us see that while autonomy may be important for mitigating the risks of indoctrination and ethical servility, the current emphasis on cultivating autonomy as the hallmark of a liberal education risks fostering a kind of ethical blindness to the other, which, on a Levinasian view, marks an impoverished rather than flourishing human life.

Cite

Plain text

BibTeX

Formatted text

Zotero

EndNote

Reference Manager

RefWorks

Options

Mark as duplicate

Find it on Scholar

Request removal from index

Revision history

Edit

Keywords

Add keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/978-3-319-72761-5_21

My notes

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-17

Downloads
4 (#1,556,099)

6 months
2 (#1,157,335)

Historical graph of downloads

How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references

Applied ethics	Epistemology	History of Western Philosophy	Meta-ethics	Metaphysics	Normative ethics
Philosophy of biology	Philosophy of language	Philosophy of mind	Philosophy of religion	Science Logic and Mathematics	More ...

Levinas

Abstract

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Citations of this work

References found in this work