Kantian Fallibilism: Knowledge, Certainty, Doubt

Midwest Studies in Philosophy 45:99-128 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

For Kant, knowledge involves certainty. If “certainty” requires that the grounds for a given propositional attitude guarantee its truth, then this is an infallibilist view of epistemic justification. Such a view says you can’t have epistemic justification for an attitude unless the attitude is also true. Here I want to defend an alternative fallibilist interpretation. Even if a subject has grounds that would be sufficient for knowledge if the proposition were true, the proposition might not be true. And so there is sometimes still rational room for doubt. The goal of this paper is to present four different models of what “certainty” amounts to, for Kant, each of which is compatible with fallibilism.

Similar books and articles

Rethinking Peirce's Fallibilism.Joseph Margolis - 2007 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (2):229-249.
Peirce, fallibilism, and the science of mathematics.Elizabeth F. Cooke - 2003 - Philosophia Mathematica 11 (2):158-175.
Fallibilism, Factivity and Epistemically Truth-Guaranteeing Justification.Boris Rähme - 2007 - In Nils Gilje & Harald Grimen (eds.), Discursive Modernity. Universitetsforlaget.
Rethinking Peirce's fallibilism.Joseph Margolis - 2007 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (2):229-249.
Haack on Fallibilism.Peter L. Mott - 1980 - Analysis 40 (4):177-183.
Why Purists Should Be Infallibilists.Michael Hannon - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (3):689-704.
Fallibilism, Underdetermination, and Skepticism.Anthony Brueckner - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (2):384-391.
Fallibilism.Baron Reed - 2012 - Philosophy Compass 7 (9):585-596.
Fallibilism and rational belief.Ruth Weintraub - 1993 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44 (2):251-261.
Fallibilism.Trent Dougherty - 2011 - In Duncan Pritchard & Sven Bernecker (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Epistemology. Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-12-08

Downloads
580 (#30,984)

6 months
244 (#10,013)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrew Chignell
Princeton University

Citations of this work

Can Metaphysics Become a Science for Kant?Gabriele Gava - 2023 - In Robb Dunphy & Toby Lovat (eds.), Metaphysics as a Science in Classical German Philosophy. New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 150-166.
Lambert on Moral Certainty and the Justification of Induction.Aaron Wells - forthcoming - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.
Induction and Certainty in the Physics of Wolff and Crusius.Hein van den Berg & Boris Demarest - forthcoming - British Journal for the History of Philosophy:1-22.
On Believing and Being Convinced.Paul Silva Jr - unknown - Cambridge University Press | Under Contract.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references