European Journal of Political Theory 15 (2):133-137 (2016)

Abstract
In philosophy and political theory, divisions come and go, but some persist despite being obviously problematic. The analytic and Continental divide is one such division. In political philosophy and political theory, the division has been particularly pronounced. Analytic and Continental thinkers are divided not only over substantial issues but also over the very nature of political theorising. In spite of this fundamental nature, theorists often seem to assume that, as a division, the analytic/Continental divide requires no explanation. We suggest that, as a central division within political theory, and despite being acknowledged as problematic for quite some time, it has persisted because it has not been adequately examined. Once examined, the division turns out to be operationally weaker than it once was. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in engaging thinkers from the other side. This has been accompanied by a corresponding tendency, among both analytic and Continental philosophers and political thinkers, to reflect on the nature of their own tradition and ‘philosophy’. Both traditions have entered a self-conscious period of meta-reflection. Such questioning indicates the possibility of transformation within both groups, in the absence of settled frameworks and divisions. However, it is also clear that such signs are the beginning of the possibility of a new relation rather than a sign of the eclipse of the division. The continued institutional separation and the space between their respective philosophical vocabularies suggest that, while the time is ripe for work here, there is still much to be done
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/1474885115582078
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,436
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Meta-Philosophy of Religion.Nick Trakakis - 2007 - Ars Disputandi 7:1-47.
What is Continental Philosophy?Simon Critchley - 1997 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (3):347 – 363.
From a Continental Point of View: The Role of Logic in the Analytic-Continental Divide.Franca D'Agostini - 2001 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 9 (3):349 – 367.
A Theory of Divides.Barry Smith - 1999 - The Analytic-Continental Divide Conference.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-04-28

Total views
29 ( #397,013 of 2,520,366 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,718 of 2,520,366 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes