Do jurists need pre-conventions?

Revus (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper offers a comparison between the legal theory of normative facts on the one hand, and Bruno Celano’s theory of pre-conventions on the other, suggesting two ways that the latter may be of use to well-meaning jurists.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Broad Internalism, Deep Conventions, Moral Entrepreneurs, and Sport.William J. Morgan - 2012 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 39 (1):65-100.
Norms and conventions.Nicholas Southwood & Lina Eriksson - 2011 - Philosophical Explorations 14 (2):195 - 217.
A new type of convention?Dale Smith - 2016 - Revus 30:69-76.
Pre-conventions.Bruno Celano - 2016 - Revus 30:9-32.
The normativity of Lewis Conventions.Francesco Guala - 2013 - Synthese 190 (15):3107-3122.
Walking the tightrope: Unrecognized conventions and arbitrariness.Megan Henricks Stotts - 2017 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 60 (8):867-887.
Demonstrative without Descriptive Conventions.S. C. Coval - 1965 - Philosophy 40 (154):334 - 343.
On convention.Andrei Marmor - 1996 - Synthese 107 (3):349 - 371.
Convention.Michael Rescorla - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Games, Rules, and Conventions.William J. Morgan - 2014 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 44 (3):383-401.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-29

Downloads
23 (#664,515)

6 months
12 (#200,125)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references