In Panayiota Vassilopoulou & Daniel Whistler (eds.), Thought: A Philosophical History. New York City, New York, USA: pp. 293-306 (2021)

Authors
Alex Dubilet
University of California, Berkeley
Kirill Chepurin
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Abstract
This paper cuts across three nineteenth-century Russian thinkers—Pyotr Chaadaev, Mikhail Bakunin and Nikolai Fedorov—to reconstruct a speculative trajectory that seeks to think an ungrounding and delegitimation of the (Christian-modern) world and its logics of violence, domination, and exclusion. In Chaadaev, Russia becomes a territory of nothingness—an absolute exception from history, tradition, and memory, without attachment or relation to world history. Ultimately, Chaadaev affirms this atopic void in its immanence, as capable of creating immanently from itself a common future. Bakunin is antagonistic to political theology as an apparatus of transcendence spanning across nature and history, cannibalism and patriotism, abstraction and religious transcendence. Against these amalgams, and against Schmitt’s naturalist reading of Bakunin, we detect in him the idea of socialism or anarchism as what has never taken place in nature or history, and the image of an unnatural humanity affirmed as the common task linking an absolute futurity with a revolutionary nowness. Against the violence of nature and history in which the present is sacrificed, and death is justified, for future life, Fedorov (the founder of Russian Cosmism) seeks to think the apocalyptic common task of immanent resurrection—and the void as the cosmic void, the expanse of the universe to be inhabited in-common. For him, thought must proceed from death and the ashes (of history and the earth) as what we have in common. The resulting trajectory is ambivalent, caught between an ungrounding of modernity and world-history, and providential or theodical modes of its justification.
Keywords nothingness  immanence  modernity  history  Russian philosophy  Russian Cosmism  anarchism  exception  futurity  resurrection
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Problem of Reason in Chaadaev's Philosophical Conception.Z. N. Smirnova - 1999 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 38 (2):8-24.
Pyotr Chaadayev About the Religious Vector of Russian History.Ol'ga Ivanovna Ivonina - 2017 - Philosophy and Culture (Russian Journal) 2:57-68.
Development of the Ideas of N. F. Fedorov in Biocosmism.V. Makogonova - 2010 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 1 (20):178-183.
Sociocultural Potential of Russian Cosmism.Zilya Habibullina - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:221-223.
Sociocultural Potential of Russian Cosmism.Zilya Habibullina - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 36:61-63.
A History of Russian Philosophy.S. R. Seliga - 1955 - Philosophical Quarterly 5 (21):375.
Pëtr Chaadaev and the Rise of Modern Russian Philosophy.Janusz Dobieszewski - 2002 - Studies in East European Thought 54 (1-2):25-46.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-05-20

Total views
28 ( #396,826 of 2,462,380 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #38,378 of 2,462,380 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes