In Agata Bielik-Robson & Daniel Whistler (eds.), Interrogating Modernity: Debates with Hans Blumenberg. London: pp. 83-107 (2020)

Joseph Albernaz
Columbia University
Kirill Chepurin
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Reading with and against Blumenberg’s The Legitimacy of the Modern Age, and following his own account of the epochal shift from the Middle Ages to modernity, this chapter takes up the genealogy and the political theology of Blumenbergian modernity so as to reanimate its relevance for contemporary theory. Beginning with the shared opposition to Gnosticism found in both Christianity and modernity, we trace the emergence of modernity as creating a “counterworld” of possibility in the face of the alienation engendered by medieval nominalist ideas of God’s absolute transcendence and hiddenness. In modernity, the world becomes sovereign: the modern world positions—and reproduces—itself as a sovereign and transcendent totality of possibility that its subjects must endlessly work to actualize, thus creating new operations and legitimations of domination. We conclude by outlining a programme of thinking what is constitutively foreclosed by Blumenberg’s modernity: an immanence alien to this Christian-modern apparatus of transcendence and possibility, a life for disorder and against the world.
Keywords Hans Blumenberg  Carl Schmitt  political theology  modernity  immanence  transcendence  possibility  sovereignty
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Void of Thought and the Ambivalence of History: Chaadaev, Bakunin, and Fedorov.Kirill Chepurin & Alex Dubilet - 2021 - In Panayiota Vassilopoulou & Daniel Whistler (eds.), Thought: A Philosophical History. New York City, New York, USA: pp. 293-306.
Romantic Bliss—or, Romanticism Is Not an Optimism.Kirill Chepurin - 2021 - European Romantic Review 32 (5-6):519-534.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Political Theology or Theology as Politics?Mario Wenning - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 61:177-184.
Blumenberg and the Modernity Problem.Robert B. Pippin - 1987 - Review of Metaphysics 40 (3):535 - 557.
The Genesis of Hans Blumenberg's "Legitimacy of the Modern Age".Anna Wertz - 2003 - Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley
Sommes-nous vraiment « déthéologisés » ?Myriam Revault D'Allones - 2004 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 1 (1):25-37.
The Legitimacy of the Modern Age in Discussion.Paulina Sosnowska - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 52:55-59.
Blumenberg, Politics, Anthropology.Brad Tabas - 2012 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 2012 (158):135-153.
Political Aspects in Hans Blumenberg’s Philosophy.Felix Heidenreich - 2015 - Revista de Filosofia Aurora 27 (41):521.


Added to PP index

Total views
195 ( #55,741 of 2,461,406 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
78 ( #9,383 of 2,461,406 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes