Two-dimensional opinion dynamics in social networks with conflicting beliefs

AI and Society 34 (4):695-704 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Two models are developed for updating opinions in social networks under situations where certain beliefs might be considered to be competing. These two models represent different attitudes of people towards the perceived conflict between beliefs. In both models agents have a degree of tolerance, which represents the extent to which the agent takes into account the differing beliefs of other agents, and a degree of conflict, which represents the extent to which two beliefs are considered to be competing. Computer simulations are used to determine how the opinion dynamics are affected by the inclusion of conflict. Results show that conflict can enhance the formation of consensus within the network in certain circumstances according to one of the models.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,389

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Models and Minds.Stuart C. Shapiro & William J. Rapaport - 1991 - In Robert E. Cummins & John L. Pollock (eds.), Philosophy and AI. Cambridge: MIT Press. pp. 215--259.
Dynamics of Lying.Hans van Ditmarsch - 2014 - Synthese 191 (5):1-33.
Student Philosophical Opinions: A Survey.Haskell Fain & E. F. Kaelin - 1960 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 3 (1-4):137 – 152.
Computationally Constrained Beliefs.Drew Mcdermott - 2013 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 20 (5-6):124-150.
The Justification Of Beliefs.L. J. Russell - 1958 - Philosophy 33 (125):121 - 131.
The Epistemic Significance of Consensus.Aviezer Tucker - 2003 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 46 (4):501 – 521.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-23

Downloads
34 (#340,505)

6 months
1 (#415,900)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David H. Glass
University of Ulster

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations