Applied technological developments are represented by (1) genetic engineering as management tools of biological evolution and (2) socio-economic engineering as management tools of civilizational and socio-cultural development. This binary structure logically follows from the postulated three-module organization of the sustainable evolutionary strategy of the sentient human being. Naturphilosophy once again acquires the status of the basis of the theory of evolution in an explicit way. There is a system of metaphysical postulates and ontological categories derived from the anthropic principle of participation. For modern neoliberal political democracy, bio-power and biopolitics look like the most effective technology for stabilizing the scenarios and trends of the global evolutionary process that are optimal within this ideological system. Conclusions.Transbipolitics in our understanding is a political problematic related to the rationalization of the global evolutionary process. In the coming decades transbipolitics will become the carrier element of the global process of evolution of the noosphere with the consequent complication and increase of cohesion between the individual socio-cultural types that are part of the system of modern globalizing civilization
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Real Science: What It is and What It Means.J. M. Ziman - 2000 - Cambridge University Press.
Biopolitics Among the Disciplines.Nitzan Lebovic - 2019 - History and Theory 58 (2):284-292.
Postdemocracy and Biopolitics.Roberto Esposito - 2019 - European Journal of Social Theory 22 (3):317-324.
Краса відносин у суспільстві: Толерантність та любов.С.А Крилова - 2012 - Вісник Харківського Національного Університету Імені В. Н. Каразіна. Серія «Філософія. Філософські Перипетії» 45:48-52.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Metatheory of Ontology Reuse.Megan Katsumi & Michael Grüninger - 2018 - Applied Ontology 13 (3):225-254.
Toward a Science of Metatheory.Steven E. Wallis - 2010 - Integral Review 6 (3):73-120.
Different Kinds of Evolution.J. Arthur Thomson - 1926 - Journal of Philosophical Studies 1 (1):50-54.
The Limit of Metatheory and the Interpretation of Hegel’s System.James Kreines - 2017 - Verifiche: Rivista Trimestrale di Scienze Umane 1 (xlvi):39-61.
The Importance of Management for Understanding Managed Care.George G. J. Agich - 1999 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (5):518 – 534.
Evolution.Roberta L. Millstein - 2017 - Stanford Encylopedia of Philosophy.


Added to PP index

Total views
55 ( #208,320 of 2,519,142 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #55,539 of 2,519,142 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes