The interpretation of "nothingness" by Hegel's Dialectic

Philosophy and Culture 28 (6):514-530 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Heidegger questions the traditional Western metaphysics forgotten as there is "face mask" and "no", the same "no" question has been troubled by Hegel, "have" and "no" of the paradox is his dialectic core concept, different from the Western "school entity" tradition, "there" meaning was reversed in the Hegelian system, in the "logic" in the The paper discussed the philosophy of Hegel, "Dirks" made ​​a "pure nothing" concept as a "there" in the second character, and discusses the "pure and pure there nothing the same "point of view. His repeated use of "pure" to demonstrate the concept of "pure there" at the beginning of the "nothingness" to highlight the "no" there are contradictions in the dialectical process of an important role. Hegel discussed in this paper fastened "pure there" , "pure no" , "absent" , "third party" , "change" concepts such as hope to reveal how Hegel builds on the tradition of the Western Logos, "no" the existence of significance. He clasped Logos tradition to explain the rational basis of intellectual activity is abandoned, an attempt to establish a set of integration "without", "negative" dialectical conflict "unified philosophy."

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-07

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references