Ethics and Information Technology 20 (4):279-289 (2018)
Abstract |
In this study, the under-examined area of privacy perception and protection on Chinese social media is investigated. The prevalence of digital technology shapes the social, political and cultural aspects of the lives of urban young adults. The influential Chinese social media platform WeChat is taken as a case study, and the ease of connection, communication and transaction combined with issues of commercialisation and surveillance are discussed in the framework of the privacy paradox. Protective behaviour and tactics are examined through different perceptions of privacy in the digital age. The findings of this study suggest that users possess certain amount of freedoms on WeChat. However, users’ individual privacy attitudes and behaviour in practice suggest they have a declined sense of their own freedom and right to privacy. A privacy paradox exists when users, while holding a high level of concerns, in reality do little to further the protection of their personal information on WeChat. We argue that once a user has ingrained part of their social engagement within the WeChat system, the incentive for them to remain a part of the system outweighs their requirement to secure their privacy online as their decision-making is largely based on a simple cost-benefit analysis. The power and social capital yielded via WeChat is too valuable to give up as WeChat is widely used not only for private conversations, but also for study or work-related purposes. It further blurs the boundaries between the public, the professional and the private, which is a rather unique case compared with other social media around the world.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1007/s10676-018-9480-6 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
Cybervetting Job Applicants on Social Media: The New Normal?Jenna Jacobson & Anatoliy Gruzd - 2020 - Ethics and Information Technology 22 (2):175-195.
Similar books and articles
Privacy and Protection of Marginalized Social Groups.Stephen Kabera Karanja - 2008 - Law and Ethics of Human Rights 2 (3).
Built-in privacy—no panacea, but a necessary condition for effective privacy protection.Alexander Dix - 2010 - Identity in the Information Society 3 (2):257-265.
Invitation to a Deity’s Celebration: How Social Media Influences Participation in the Activities of Chinese Folk Temples.Kuo-Yan Wang - 2015 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 14 (42):231-251.
Negotiating Privacy Through Phatic Communication. A Case Study of the Blogging Self.Stine Lomborg - 2012 - Philosophy and Technology 25 (3):415-434.
Privacy and Data Privacy Issues in Contemporary China.Lü Yao-Huai - 2005 - Ethics and Information Technology 7 (1):7-15.
Information and Friend Segregation for Online Social Networks: A User Study.Javed Ahmed, Serena Villata & Guido Governatori - 2019 - AI and Society 34 (4):753-766.
Privacy Expectations at Work—What is Reasonable and Why?Elin Palm - 2009 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (2):201-215.
Why the Duty to Self-Censor Requires Social-Media Users to Maintain Their Own Privacy.Earl Spurgin - 2019 - Res Publica 25 (1):1-19.
“But the Data is Already Public”: On the Ethics of Research in Facebook.Michael Zimmer - 2010 - Ethics and Information Technology 12 (4):313-325.
Areas of Privacy in Facebook.Katherina Glac, Dawn R. Elm & Kirsten Martin - 2014 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 33 (2-3):147-176.
The Relevance of Media Education in Primary Schools in Hong Kong in the Age of New Media: A Case Study.C. K. Cheung - 2005 - Educational Studies 31 (4):361-374.
In Nearly Every Survey of Public Opinion and the Media, Privacy is a Premiere Issue If the Press Wishes to Main its Credibility. The Laws Safeguarding Privacy Are Impressive, but Legal Prescriptions Are an Inadequate Foundation for the News Business. Privacy is Not a Legal Right Only but a Moral Good. For All of the Sophistication of Case Law and Tort Law in Protecting Privacy, Legal Definitions Do Not Match Today's Challenges. Merely Following the Letter of the Law Presumes the Law Can Be Determined ... [REVIEW]Clifford G. Christians - 2010 - In Christopher Meyers (ed.), Journalism Ethics: A Philosophical Approach. Oxford University Press. pp. 203.
Rites of Privacy and the Privacy Trade: On the Limits of Protection for the Self.Elizabeth Neill - 2001 - Mcgill-Queen's University Press.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2018-09-06
Total views
45 ( #251,641 of 2,507,715 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,449 of 2,507,715 )
2018-09-06
Total views
45 ( #251,641 of 2,507,715 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,449 of 2,507,715 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads