Law, Humanity, and Reason: The Chinese Debate, the Habermasian Approach, and a Kantian Outcome

Asian Philosophy 23 (1):100-114 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper explores the subject-matter of the relationship between law and humanity, filling a significant lacuna in philosophy of law in the West today. Doing so, the paper starts with recasting the traditional Chinese conflict—in particular, the conflict between legalism and Confucianism—over law in a new light of the contemporary call for stopping crimes against humanity. It then explores Habermas’ insight into and illusion of law. Finally, it examines the internal relationship between law and humanity, contending that law must always treat humanity as a purpose, not as a tool to other ends, functioning to build a community of humanity; while a distinction exists between justice and benevolence, law must not be inhumane.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,607

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-01-24

Downloads
68 (#306,071)

6 months
7 (#673,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Xunwu Chen
University of Texas at San Antonio

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations