Axiomathes 29 (5):541-559 (2019)

This paper examines Hume’s formulations and uses of the conceivability principle and the inconceivability principle. In Hume’s works, we identify different versions of CP and ICP, including proper CP, proper ICP, the weak versions of CP and ICP, the epistemic versions of CP and ICP, and show that Hume not only expresses ICP, but also really maintains it. Assuming an axiomatic characterization of modalities, we argue that if there is a sharp distinction between levels of modalities, then Hume’s conceivability arguments do not hold. But, in a rather different way, we also argue that if Hume’s conceivability arguments hold, then there should be no distinction between levels of modalities. Finally, we argue that after Hume, there are lots of endeavors in logic and philosophy to distinguish different levels of modalities, and to accept new concepts of necessity other than logical necessity.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10516-019-09422-5
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,564
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

How To Avoid Mis‐Reiding Hume's Maxim Of Conceivability.Lewis Powell - 2013 - Philosophical Quarterly 63 (250):105-119.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Hume on Knowledge of Metaphysical Modalities.Daniel Dohrn - 2010 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 13.
Hume on Possibility and Necessity.David Eric Lightner - 1996 - Dissertation, The Ohio State University
How To Avoid Mis‐Reiding Hume's Maxim Of Conceivability.Lewis Powell - 2013 - Philosophical Quarterly 63 (250):105-119.
Introduction: Conceivability and Possibility.Tamar Szabó Gendler & John Hawthorne - 2002 - In T. Szabó Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Conceivability and Possibility. Oxford University Press. pp. 1--70.
Conceivability and Possibility.Albert Casullo - 1975 - Ratio (Misc.) 17 (1):118-121.
From Conceivability to Possibility.Roger S. Woolhouse - 1972 - Ratio (Misc.) 14 (2):144--154.
Hume, Causation and Two Arguments Concerning God.Jason Megill - 2014 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 6 (2):169--177.


Added to PP index

Total views
42 ( #273,838 of 2,533,484 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #391,480 of 2,533,484 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes