Generality above Abstraction: The General Expressed in Terms of the Paradigmatic in Mathematics in Ancient China

Science in Context 16 (3) (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Artificial Languages in the Mathematics of Ancient China.Karine Chemla - 2006 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 34 (1-2):31-56.
Rigidity, natural kind terms and metasemantics.Corine Besson - 2010 - In Helen Beebee & Nigel Sabbarton-Leary (eds.), The Semantics and Metaphysics of Natural Kinds. Routledge. pp. 25--44.
Reid’s Answer to Abstract Ideas.Susan V. Castagnetto - 1992 - Journal of Philosophical Research 17:39-60.
The limits of abstraction.Kit Fine - 2002 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Matthias Schirn.
Generality.Nathan Salmon - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 161 (3):471-481.
Generality and moral justification.Don Loeb - 1996 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56 (1):79-96.
Abstraction Relations Need Not Be Reflexive.Jonathan Payne - 2013 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 2 (2):137-147.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-27

Downloads
23 (#664,515)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Add more references