Creativity is an essential factor in ensuring the sustainable development of a society. Improving students’ creativity has gained much attention in education, especially in Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics education. In a quasi-experimental design, this study examines the effectiveness of a project-based STEAM program on the development of creativity in Chinese elementary school science education. We selected two fourth-graders classes. One received a project-based STEAM program, and the other received a conventional science teaching over 6 weeks. Students’ creativity was assessed before and after the intervention using a multi-method approach, including a test of divergent thinking, a story completion through the Consensus Assessment Technique, a creative self-efficacy measure, and a group-based creative project. Moreover, all students received a test of their science knowledge after the intervention. The results showed that compared with the control group, the creativity of the experimental group students improved significantly for 6 weeks at both individual and group level, even though their knowledge in science were comparable. This result confirmed the effectiveness of a project-based STEAM educational program improving elementary school students’ creativity. Implications are discussed.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.763948
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,379
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Education and the Creative Potential.E. P. Torrance (ed.) - 1963 - Univ of Minnesota Press.
Education and the Creative Potential.Dick Field & E. Paul Torrance - 1964 - British Journal of Educational Studies 12 (2):232.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Editorial: Ethics and Engineering Design.Peter-Paul Verbeek & Ibo van de Poel - 2006 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 31 (3):223-236.
Mathematics, Music & Architecture.Giuseppe Conti, Beatrice Sedili & Alberto Trotta - 2017 - Science and Philosophy 5 (1):129-148.
Teaching Ethics and Technology with Agora, an Electronic Tool.Simone Burg & Ibo Poel - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (2):277-297.


Added to PP index

Total views

Recent downloads (6 months)

How can I increase my downloads?


Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes