Between Benevolence and Righteousness

Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 9:101-113 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The notion of benevolence-righteousness un-doubtedly constitutes the core of Mencius’s theory concerning the goodness of human nature, it also holds the key to the entire Confucian ethics. Despite the fact that we normally give Confucius credit for his discussion over the concept of benevolence, it is Mencius who creates the conjoint of benevolence-righteousness.But as a category benevolence-righteous-ness does not represent a sheer combination of benevolence and righteousness, but suggests a new or reformative version of this line of thought in the intellectual development within Confucian tradition. Mencius’s unique contribution by no means lies in an effort of simply forming a linkage between the two terms, but in the fact that he gives this concept a deeper connotation so as to transform it into an intrinsic-meaning-structure. Mencius’s thinking on this regard is mainly expressed through his theory of human nature, which forms the relation of benevolence and righteous-ness, the two most important among the four starting point. This paper aims to seek a comprehension of the Confucian stance towards evil or the negative phenomena in morality. According to Mencius’s under-standing, the meaning of righteousness is twofold, namely the sense of shame and the hatred of evil. Insofar as consciousness-structure is concerned, both pertain to the compassion for the innocent victims. The former refers to sort of reflection and repentance due to one’s sense of compassion; the latter to one’s coming forward against evil driven by the sense of compassion. Together they depict the whole picture of the Confucian treatment of the evil or immoral phenomena. Thus the sense of shame and that of the hatred of evil become an essential resource for the study of the sense of justice in Confucianism. In a word, the notion of benevolence-righteousness indicates the combination of promoting the good and prohibiting the evil, whose function can be taken in both ethical and political terms.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Luo Congyan’s Ethics.Guorong Yang & Mo Xiao - 2005 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (1):102-113.
Hate, Resentment, and Righteousness in Mengzi’s Moral Sentimentalism.Yonghwan Chung - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 9:25-29.
Mou Zongsan’s view of interpreting Confucianism by “moral autonomy”.Guo Qiyong - 2007 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (3):345-362.
Compassion and Moral Judgment in Mencius.Myeong-Seok Kim - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 9:13-22.
The Bridge of Benevolence: Hutcheson and Mencius.Alejandra Mancilla - 2013 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 12 (1):57-72.
Setting the Record Straight: Confucius' Notion of Ren. [REVIEW]Shirong Luo - 2012 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 11 (1):39-52.
The Thought about the Manifestation of Wisdom in Practice.Hsiao-Huei Pan - 2002 - Philosophy and Culture 29 (10):891-903.
Shame and the Confucian Idea of Yi.Yinghua Lu - 2018 - International Philosophical Quarterly 58 (1):5-18.
Extensive Benevolence.John P. Reeder Jr - 1998 - Journal of Religious Ethics 26 (1):47 - 70.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-05-08

Downloads
9 (#1,080,087)

6 months
1 (#1,042,085)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references