Are Workers More Likely to be Deviant than Managers? A Cross-National Analysis

Journal of Business Ethics 123 (2):221-233 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Using Robert Merton’s perspective on social structure [Social theory and structure. Free Press, New York, 1968], this study tested the individual-level association between job position and ethical reasoning. Anomie theory was employed to examine how country-level factors moderate that individual-level association. The hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) method was used to analyze 22,359 subjects from 28 nations. The statistical results proved that workers are more likely to justify ethically suspect behaviors, and that this individual-level relationship is moderated by the country-level factors of power distance, masculinity, social inequality, and education accessibility. These results imply that Merton’s view of social structure and contemporary anomie theorists’ perspective of anomie [Messner and Rosenfeld (Crime and the American dream. Wadsworth, Belmont, 2001); Rosenfeld and Messner (The future of anomie theory. Northeastern University Press, Boston, 1997)] are mutually complementary rather than exclusive.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,088

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Defending Liberalism Against the Anomie Challenge.Andrew J. Cohen - 2004 - Social Theory and Practice 30 (3):391-427.
Creating and Maintaining Ethical Work Climates.Deborah Vidaver Cohen - 1993 - Business Ethics Quarterly 3 (4):343-358.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-15

Downloads
52 (#280,502)

6 months
4 (#404,301)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?