Why Philosophy of Language is Unreliable for Understanding Unreliable Filmic Narration

Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 59 (2):43-50 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A typical device in film is to have a character narrating what is going on, but this narration is not always a reliable guide to the events. According to Maier, distortions may be caused by the narrator’s intent, naivety, use of drugs, and/or cognitive disorder/illness. What is common to these various causes, he argues, is the presence of a point of view, which appears in a movie as shots. While this perspective-based account of unreliability covers most cases, I unpack its methodological consequences and gesture at a possibility that Maier’s analysis overlooks. A narration, I suggest, can be unreliable simply because it is ill-timed with the events shown on screen. In such a case, the distortion is not due to any character’s point of view; rather, it comes from the film medium’s ability to divorce what is seen and what is heard. As a consequence of this mismatch, it is possible to have a reliable narrator but an unreliable narration. Since voice and context of utterance usually match in ordinary speech, I conclude that philosophy of language may be ill-suited to properly understand this particular phenomenon.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Filmic Representation of ‘Relived’ Experiences.Kristina Liefke - 2022 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 59 (2):56-65.
Unreliable Narration and Dual Perspective.Julian J. Schloder - 2022 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 59 (2):66-71.
Unreliability and Point of View in Filmic Narration.Emar Maier - 2022 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 59 (2):23-37.
Impossible Fictions Part I: Lessons for Fiction.Daniel Nolan - 2021 - Philosophy Compass 16 (2):1-12.
Convention, Coherence and Control.Daniel B. Tiskin - 2022 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 59 (2):72-75.
Extracting fictional truth from unreliable sources.Emar Maier & Merel Semeijn - 2021 - In Emar Maier & Andreas Stokke (eds.), The Language of Fiction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
A Possible-Worlds Construal of Unreliability in Film.Dorit Abusch - 2022 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 59 (2):38-42.
Unreliable Knowledge.John Turri - 2013 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 90 (3):529-545.
The logic of thought experiments.Martin Bunzl - 1996 - Synthese 106 (2):227 - 240.
Can There Be Apossible World In Which Memory Is Unreliable? Edwin - 1989 - Philosophical Inquiry 11 (3-4):46-47.
Reliability and Justification.Richard Feldman - 1985 - The Monist 68 (2):159-174.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-06-20

Downloads
434 (#40,904)

6 months
130 (#22,525)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marc Champagne
Kwantlen Polytechnic University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations