Biology and Philosophy 27 (5):755-765 (2012)
AbstractThe new millennium has opened with a perfectly splendid decade of scholarship relating to the ‘Species Problem’. So, at least we now have a clear idea of what this is, but still no clear solution that will suit both biologists and philosophers. Richards has recently attempted to capture this story and to fill the void with two projects in one book. The first project is a descriptive and analytical history of the problem, which provides links to other recent works and thereby allows one to fully reconstruct the literature. The second is prescriptive and presents Richards’s solution via a ‘division of labour in a conceptual framework’ followed by recapitulation and conclusions. It is my assessment as presented here that the first project will appeal more to biologists and the second one to philosophers. There is much of value in Richards approach including an excellent evaluation of the essentialism story in the descriptive project and clear exposition of several key issues such as the ‘species-as-individuals’ versus ‘species-as-categories’ debate which are covered in the second project. Interesting and informative as these arguments undoubtedly are, something still seems to be missing here. In this essay I suggest that this perception arises from Richards’ failure to embrace ideas about the importance of relativity and contingency in species definitions and further that his new conceptual framework lacks one hierarchical level to link overarching lineage concepts of species as evolutionary units with practical definitions for their recognition. In my view, the missing link is reproductive isolation and I conclude my review by presenting a prescriptive project for biologists to balance the one that Richards has delivered to philosophers.
Similar books and articles
Species as family resemblance concepts: the (dis-)solution of the species problem?Massimo Pigliucci - 2003 - Bioessays 25 (6):596-602.
For pluralism and against realism about species.P. Kyle Stanford - 1995 - Philosophy of Science 62 (1):70-91.
Species concepts and the ontology of evolution.Joel Cracraft - 1987 - Biology and Philosophy 2 (3):329-346.
A (not-so-radical) solution to the species problem.Bradley E. Wilson - 1995 - Biology and Philosophy 10 (3):339-356.
Methodological problems in evolutionary biology VII. The species plague.Wim J. Steen & Bart Voorzanger - 1986 - Acta Biotheoretica 35 (3).
Why was Darwin’s view of species rejected by twentieth century biologists?James Mallet - 2010 - Biology and Philosophy 25 (4):497-527.
The cladistic solution to the species problem.Mark Ridley - 1989 - Biology and Philosophy 4 (1):1-16.
On species individualism: A new defense of the species-as-individuals hypothesis.Keith A. Coleman & E. O. Wiley - 2001 - Philosophy of Science 68 (4):498-517.
Microbiology and the species problem.Marc Ereshefsky - 2010 - Biology and Philosophy 25 (4):553-568.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Las especies son linajes de poblaciones microevolutivamente interconectadas: uma mejor delimitación del concepto evolucionário de especie.Gustavo Caponi - 2013 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 17 (3):395.
References found in this work
The Species Problem: A Philosophical Analysis.Richard A. Richards - 2010 - Cambridge University Press.
The Creation of the Essentialism Story: An Exercise in Metahistory.Mary P. Winsor - 2006 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 28 (2):149 - 174.
The Species Problem: Biological Species, Ontology, and the Metaphysics of Biology.David N. Stamos - 2003 - Lexington Books.
Non-essentialist methods in pre-Darwinian taxonomy.Mary P. Winsor - 2003 - Biology and Philosophy 18 (3):387-400.