Journal of Semantics 33 (3):561–622 (2016)

Lucas Champollion
New York University
The word 'and' can be used both intersectively, as in 'John lies and cheats', and collectively, as in 'John and Mary met'. Research has tried to determine which one of these two meanings is basic. Focusing on coordination of nouns ('liar and cheat'), this article argues that the basic meaning of 'and' is intersective. This theory has been successfully applied to coordination of other kinds of constituents (Partee & Rooth 1983; Winter 2001). Certain cases of noun coordination ('men and women') challenge this view, and have therefore been argued to favor the collective theory (Heycock & Zamparelli 2005). The main result of this article is that the intersective theory actually predicts the collective behavior of 'and' in 'men and women'. 'And' leads to collectivity by interacting with silent operators involving set minimization and choice functions, which have been postulated to account for phenomena involving indefinites, collective predicates and coordinations of noun phrases (Winter 2001). This article also shows that the collective theory does not generalize to coordinations of noun phrases in the way it has been previously suggested.
Keywords Coordination  Plurals  Collectivity  Distributivity  Choice functions  Numerals  Type shifting  Boolean semantics  Hydras
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2016
DOI 10.1093/jos/ffv008
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

General Semantics.David K. Lewis - 1970 - Synthese 22 (1-2):18--67.
Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language.John Barwise & Robin Cooper - 1981 - Linguistics and Philosophy 4 (2):159--219.
The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English.Richard Montague - 1973 - In Patrick Suppes, Julius Moravcsik & Jaakko Hintikka (eds.), Approaches to Natural Language. Dordrecht. pp. 221--242.
Universal Grammar.Richard Montague - 1970 - Theoria 36 (3):373--398.

View all 50 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Composing Alternatives.Ivano Ciardelli, Floris Roelofsen & Nadine Theiler - 2017 - Linguistics and Philosophy 40 (1):1-36.
Weak Speech Reports.Martín Abreu Zavaleta - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (8):2139-2166.
Overt Distributivity in Algebraic Event Semantics.Lucas Champollion - 2016 - Semantics and Pragmatics 9 (16):1-65.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Lambek Calculus Enriched with Additional Connectives.Makoto Kanazawa - 1992 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 1 (2):141-171.
The Semantics of Non-Boolean “And”.Jack Hoeksema - 1988 - Journal of Semantics 6 (1):19-40.
Family Planning in Isparta, Turkey.F. Ozcan - 1997 - Journal of Biosocial Science 29 (4):509-510.
Ciudadanía, familia Y mujer inmigrante víctima de violencia de género.Mercedes Soto Moya - 2008 - Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez 42:177-198.
Imperatives in Conditional Conjunction.Benjamin Russell - 2007 - Natural Language Semantics 15 (2):131-166.
Coordination and Cooperation.Maarten C. W. Janssen - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):165-166.
Theory-Conjunction and Mercenary Reliance.J. D. Trout - 1992 - Philosophy of Science 59 (2):231-245.


Added to PP index

Total views
364 ( #28,589 of 2,518,111 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
58 ( #13,850 of 2,518,111 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes