Senses: response to Marco Ruffino

Manuscrito 31 (1):315-329 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Marco Ruffino compares the notion of sense developed in my book with Frege’s notion of sense, and argues that whereas there are ontological similarities, my notion faces epistemological and semantic problems. In my response I discuss the various issues he raises, arguing that my notion of sense can confront them at least as well as Frege’s notion.Marco Ruffino compara a noção de sentido desenvolvida em meu livro com a noção de sentido de Frege, argumentando que mesmo havendo semelhanças ontológicas, minha noção está sujeita a problemas epistemológicos e semânticos. Em minha réplica considero os problemas levantados por Marco, argumentando que minha noção de sentido pode confrontá-los pelo menos tão adequadamente quanto a noção de Frege

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Chateaubriand's senses.Marco Ruffino - 2008 - Manuscrito 31 (1):299-314.
Chateaubriand on the slingshot arguments.Marco Ruffino - 2004 - Manuscrito 27 (1):201-209.
Review. [REVIEW]Marco Ruffino - 1993 - Erkenntnis 39 (3):421-424.
Context and quantifier domain.Marco Ruffino - 2009 - Manuscrito 32 (1):283-307.
Frege's view on vagueness.Marco Ruffino - 2003 - Manuscrito 26 (2):253-277.
Taxonomising the Senses.Fiona Macpherson - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 153 (1):123-142.
The significance of the senses.Matthew Nudds - 2004 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104 (1):31-51.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-12

Downloads
44 (#344,726)

6 months
5 (#544,079)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references