Representing a Past: A Historical Analysis of how Gender Biases Influence the Interpretation of Archaeological Remains

Constellations (University of Alberta Student Journal) 1 (1) (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The cultural and temporal context that any archaeologist is a part of will necessarily bias the way in which he or she interprets material remains. While interpretation is a crucial part of the archaeological process, the preconceived notions an archaeologist may hold can colour their interpretation of the society in question. Through examples such as the excavations at Knossos in Crete, the effect such biases can have on archaeological interpretation and discourse is studied

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Ritual Birth of Sense.C. J. C. Pickstock - 2013 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 2013 (162):29-55.
Archaeological theory and scientific practice.Andrew Jones - 2002 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The scope and limits of biological explanations in archaeology.Ben Jeffares - 2003 - Dissertation, Victoria University of Wellington
Aid and bias.Keith Horton - 2004 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 47 (6):545 – 561.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-21

Downloads
111 (#152,637)

6 months
6 (#349,140)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Honoring Ambiguity/Problematizing Certitude.J. Gero - 2007 - Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 14:311-327.
Review. [REVIEW]J. Hall - 1983 - Bibliothèque d'Humanisme Et Renaissance 45 (2):442-444.

Add more references