Perceiving the Present and a Systematization of Illusions

Cognitive Science 32 (3):459-503 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Over the history of the study of visual perception there has been great success at discovering countless visual illusions. There has been less success in organizing the overwhelming variety of illusions into empirical generalizations (much less explaining them all via a unifying theory). Here, this article shows that it is possible to systematically organize more than 50 kinds of illusion into a 7 × 4 matrix of 28 classes. In particular, this article demonstrates that (1) smaller sizes, (2) slower speeds, (3) greater luminance contrast, (4) farther distance, (5) lower eccentricity, (6) greater proximity to the vanishing point, and (7) greater proximity to the focus of expansion all tend to have similar perceptual effects, namely, to (A) increase perceived size, (B) increase perceived speed, (C) decrease perceived luminance contrast, and (D) decrease perceived distance. The detection of these empirical regularities was motivated by a hypothesis, called “perceiving the present,” that the visual system possesses mechanisms for compensating neural delay during forward motion. This article shows how this hypothesis predicts the empirical regularity.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Response to Briscoe (2010).Mark A. Changizi - 2010 - Cognitive Science 34 (8):1543-1547.
The disjunctive conception of perceiving.Adrian Haddock - 2011 - Philosophical Explorations 14 (1):23-42.
Subjectiviteit en illusie.Msgk van Nierop - 1996 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 58 (4):631-642.
Susceptibility to optical illusions: specific or general?M. A. Tinker - 1938 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 22 (6):593.
Theory-Laden Experience and Illusions.Terence Rajivan Edward - 2011 - Ethos: Dialogues in Philosophy and Social Sciences 4 (2):58-67.
The Concept of Illusion.Martin Clay Fowler - 1980 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Binghamton
Olfactory illusions: Where are they?Richard J. Stevenson - 2011 - Consciousness and Cognition 20 (4):1887-1898.
Naïve Realism and Illusion.Boyd Millar - 2015 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 2:607-625.
The illusions of scientists vs. the illusions of social epistemologists.E. C. - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (2):343-351.
Disjunctivism: An Answer to Two Pseudo Problems?Alexander Gebharter & Alexander G. Mirnig - 2010 - Conceptus: Zeitschrift Fur Philosophie 39 (95):61-84.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
13 (#978,482)

6 months
7 (#350,235)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The Study of Instinct.N. Tinbergen - 1954 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 5 (17):72-76.
The geometry of visibles.R. B. Angell - 1974 - Noûs 8 (2):87-117.
Thomas Reid's discovery of a non-euclidean geometry.Norman Daniels - 1972 - Philosophy of Science 39 (2):219-234.
Euclides ab omni naevo vindicatus.J. R. Lucas - 1969 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 20 (1):1-11.
Judgmental model of the Ebbinghaus illusion.Dominic W. Massaro & Norman H. Anderson - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 89 (1):147.

View all 10 references / Add more references