Prisoners as research participants: current practice and attitudes in the UK

, , &
Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (4):246-252 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1136/medethics-2012-101059

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Offering to Return Results to Research Participants: Attitudes and Needs of Principal Investigators in the Children's Oncology Group.Conrad V. Fernandez, Eric Kodish, Susan Shurin & Charles Weijer - unknown
Attitudes of research ethics board chairs towards disclosure of research results to participants: results of a national survey.S. D. MacNeil & C. V. Fernandez - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (9):549-553.
Prisoner research ''“ looking back or looking forward?David L. Thomas - 2009 - Bioethics 24 (1):23-26.
Disclosure of Research Result to Research Participants: Needs and Attitudes of Adolescents and Parents.Conrad Vincent Fernandez, Shaureen Taweel, Eric D. Kodish & Charles Weijer - unknown
Deceived versus nondeceived participants' perceptions of scientific and applied psychology.Elizabeth Soliday & Annette L. Stanton - 1995 - Ethics and Behavior 5 (1):87 – 104.
Payment of research participants: current practice and policies of Irish research ethics committees.Eric Roche, Romaine King, Helen M. Mohan, Blanaid Gavin & Fiona McNicholas - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (9):591-593.
Ageing Prisoners’ Views on Death and Dying: Contemplating End-of-Life in Prison.Violet Handtke & Tenzin Wangmo - 2014 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 11 (3):373-386.
Finnish people's attitudes towards biomedical research and its sponsorship.Elina Hemminki, Aaro Tupasela, Piia Jallinoja, Arja Aro & Karolina Snell - 2009 - Genomics, Society and Policy 5 (1):1-13.
Respecting Autonomy Over Time: Policy and Empirical Evidence on Re‐Consent in Longitudinal Biomedical Research.Susan E. Wallace, Elli G. Gourna, Graeme Laurie, Osama Shoush & Jessica Wright - 2015 - Bioethics 30 (3):210-217.
From Research Assistant to Professional Research Assistance: Research Consulting as a Form of Research Practice.Dawn E. Pollon, Monique Herbert, Saad Chahine & Olesya Falenchuk - 2013 - Journal of Research Practice 9 (2):Article M6.
What does 'respect for persons' require? Attitudes and reported practices of genetics researchers in informing research participants about research.F. A. Miller, R. Z. Hayeems, L. Li & J. P. Bytautas - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (1):48-52.
Research on prisoners – a comparison between the iom committee recommendations (2006) and european regulations.Bernice S. Elger & Anne Spaulding - 2009 - Bioethics 24 (1):1-13.
A review of ethical frameworks for the disclosure of individual research results in population-based genetic and genomic research. [REVIEW]Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne - 2012 - Research Ethics 8 (1):25-42.
Research on Prisoners – a Comparison Between the Iom Committee Recommendations (2006) and European Regulations.Anne Spaulding Bernice S. Elger - 2009 - Bioethics 24 (1):1-13.
Conclusion: Prisoners and Detainees in Current and Future Military Operations.Sibylle Scheipers - 2010 - In Prisoners in War. Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-03

Downloads
31 (#486,401)

6 months
8 (#283,518)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Annette Rid
University of Zürich

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Scientific research is a moral duty.J. Harris - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (4):242-248.
Bioethics, vulnerability, and protection.Ruth Macklin - 2003 - Bioethics 17 (5-6):472--486.

View all 13 references / Add more references